Handbook of Palliative Care 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118426869.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palliative Care in the Community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relevance of continuity was evident on a number of levels, supporting existing work20 21 that sought to define and explore dimensions of continuity in general, and in detail, on continuity in palliative care 22. Freeman and Hughes’ recent definition of two key types of continuity—relationship and management (box 3) is useful in the context of this article's findings 23…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The relevance of continuity was evident on a number of levels, supporting existing work20 21 that sought to define and explore dimensions of continuity in general, and in detail, on continuity in palliative care 22. Freeman and Hughes’ recent definition of two key types of continuity—relationship and management (box 3) is useful in the context of this article's findings 23…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The interviews explored the following areas: the symptoms the patient was experiencing and their progress over time, social context and medical management prior to admission; the patient and carer's roles in self-management; healthcare staff’s involvement in the critical incident; process and experience of admission; and identification of factors that could potentially have prevented the emergency admission. The interview schedules were developed by drawing on a previous study of emergency admission, 17 a brief exploration of the health service contexts by key informant interviews with clinicians based at the recruitment hospital sites, and a literature review to explore the wider context.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 16 Few studies have explored reasons for emergency admission, or the process of decision-making, from the perspective of patients with advanced chronic life-limiting illnesses. 16 17 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). At‐risk registers (Munday & Dale ) should be developed for patients on long‐term dialysis and with transplants, and suggested triggers may include two or more non‐elective admissions in the last year; weight loss of 10% on dialysis not connected with fluid losses over six months; cognitive decline that worries family and staff and use of the ‘surprise question’—‘would you be surprised if this patient were to die in the next 6 to 12 months’? (NHS Kidney Care and the NHS National End of Life Care Programme ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%