Background
Surgical morbidity and mortality (M&M) for patients with disseminated malignancy (DMa) is high, and some have questioned the role of surgery. Therefore, we sought to characterize temporal trends in M&M among DMa patients, hypothesizing that surgical intervention would remain prevalent.
Methods
We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2006 to 2010. Excluding patients undergoing a primary hepatic operation, we identified 21,755 patients with DMa. Parametric/non-parametric statistics and logistic regression were used to evaluate temporal trends and predictors of M&M.
Results
The prevalence of surgical intervention for DMa declined slightly over the time period, from 1.9% to 1.6% of all procedures (p<0.01). Among DMa patients, the most frequent operations performed were bowel resection, other gastrointestinal procedures, and multivisceral resections, these all showed small statistically significant decreases over time (p<0.01). The rate of emergency operations also decreased (p<0.01). In contrast, the rate of preoperative independent functional status rose, while the rate of preoperative weight loss and sepsis decreased (p<0.01). Rates of 30-day morbidity (33.7 vs 26.6%), serious morbidity (19.8 vs 14.2%), and mortality (10.4 vs 9.3%) all decreased over the study period (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis identified standard predictors (e.g. impaired functional status, pre-operative weight loss pre-operative sepsis, and hypoalbuminemia) of worse 30-day M&M.
Conclusion
30-day morbidity, serious morbidity, and mortality have decreased incrementally for patients with DMa undergoing surgical intervention, but surgical intervention remains prevalent. These data further highlight the importance of careful patient selection and goal-directed therapy in patients with incurable malignancy.