2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2021.179095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palmitic acid graphene composite phase change materials: A molecular dynamics simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulated phase transition temperatures for the pure PA and PA/pristine graphene systems were 332 and 325 K, respectively. Compared to that of pure PA, the phase‐transition temperatures of the PA/pristine graphene composites were higher by ~7 K. In our previous study, [ 31 ] the addition of graphene led to a decrease in the phase transition temperature of the system. As the mass fraction of added graphene was larger in this study, the phase transition temperature decrease was greater.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The simulated phase transition temperatures for the pure PA and PA/pristine graphene systems were 332 and 325 K, respectively. Compared to that of pure PA, the phase‐transition temperatures of the PA/pristine graphene composites were higher by ~7 K. In our previous study, [ 31 ] the addition of graphene led to a decrease in the phase transition temperature of the system. As the mass fraction of added graphene was larger in this study, the phase transition temperature decrease was greater.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The thermal conductivity improvement was about 2.5 times higher because of the presence of graphite layers. Gao et al 103 simulated palmitic acid (a fatty acid) containing graphene. The addition of 5 weight percent of graphene increased the thermal conductivity of palmitic acid by about 36.4 and 40.4% in solid and liquid phases respectively.…”
Section: Background Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These materials have simple structures and can be simulated using the hybrid potentials of PCFF and Leonard-Jones using the molecular dynamics method as one of the best force fields. Albeit, as listed in Table 1, several force fields were utilized for PCMs such as Snyder force field, 28 Ryckaert and Bellemans, 29,31 COMPASS, 41,45,51,65–67,70,78–81,87,96,102–108 PYS, 43,50 Weber, 47 Buckingham, 49,54 NERD, 53,68,71–73,86,94,97 EIM, 55 GROMOS, 57,60,61 CHARMM, 59,83,90 OPLSAA, 64,109 Universal force field (UFF), 75,82,95,111 PCFF, 37,76,84,85 TraPPE, 77 Dreiding, 89 Born–Mayer–Huggins (BMH), 93 GAFF, 98,101 CVFF. 110 Some of the utilized force fields were placed in the simulated material box of Table 8 in {} signs.…”
Section: A Molecular Dynamics Based Grouping (Pcm Simulation Table)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various experimental conditions and operational levels result in large discrepancies between experimental results. As an effective method of simulation experiments, the development of molecular dynamics (MD) methods for simulating and predicting material properties is essential for reducing the experimental costs and revealing the mechanism behind the phenomenon 26–28 . MD can be a good way to analyze the thermal conductivity of materials under diverse operating conditions and the factors affecting the thermal conductivity of nanocomposites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%