2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2015.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palygorskite for the uptake and removal of pharmaceuticals for wastewater treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). Ibuprofen was removed within 50 h to undetectable concentrations and paracetamol was removed to acceptable levels in approximately 73−77 h. For IBU, the largest amount of this pharmaceutical was removed in 6−10 h. This quick removal may indicate not only biodegradation but also external sorption sites on the solids for IBU removal from water [40]. The removal of PARA was slower, for the concentration of 0.4 mg/L the largest amount of PARA was removed on the first 29 h and for the highest concentration, 1 mg/L, the time to reached equilibrium was more than 73 h. The uptake rates and removal percentages are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Ibuprofen and Paracetamol Removal Performance By Activated Sludge And Comparison With Adsorption Processesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2). Ibuprofen was removed within 50 h to undetectable concentrations and paracetamol was removed to acceptable levels in approximately 73−77 h. For IBU, the largest amount of this pharmaceutical was removed in 6−10 h. This quick removal may indicate not only biodegradation but also external sorption sites on the solids for IBU removal from water [40]. The removal of PARA was slower, for the concentration of 0.4 mg/L the largest amount of PARA was removed on the first 29 h and for the highest concentration, 1 mg/L, the time to reached equilibrium was more than 73 h. The uptake rates and removal percentages are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Ibuprofen and Paracetamol Removal Performance By Activated Sludge And Comparison With Adsorption Processesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several studies have demonstrated that increasing the interaction temperature increases the adsorption capacity of cationic PPs onto clay minerals (Chang et al, 2014;Y. Chen, Zhou, Liu, & Liang, 2010), whereas the opposite results were recorded for the same charge state (W.-T. Jiang, Chang, Tsai, & Li, 2016;Z. Li, Fitzgerald, Jiang, & Lv, 2016).…”
Section: Temperature Effectmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Yet, the adsorption kinetic of PPs onto clay minerals is considered as spontaneous for the cation exchange mechanism, and other interactions are also significant for a very short interaction time (Z. Li et al, 2016;.…”
Section: Fixed-bed Adsorption Of Pps Onto Raw and Modified Clay Mineralsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process promotes the total mineralization of the pollutants, generating CO 2, H 2 O, and ionic compounds [17,18]. Some classes of compounds susceptible to degradation by photocatalysis are alkanes, chloroaliphatics, azo compounds, alcohols, carboxylic acids, phenols, chlorophenols, herbicides, surfactants, and dyes [19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%