Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) may indicate the first manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is estimated that the incidence of AIHA is around 10% in patients with SLE. The first-line therapy for AIHA is corticosteroids. Nevertheless, a second-line therapy may be considered if an adequate response is not obtained. Transfusion indication in AIHA patients do not differ from other types of anemia. These indications include the degree of hemolysis, the progression of anemia, and clinical symptoms. However, blood transfusion for AIHA patients is challenging due to the limited availability of serologically compatible blood. In addition, AIHA patients who receive transfusions have an increased risk of experiencing hemolytic transfusion reactions. In this paper, we aimed to present a case report on the diagnosis of AIHA in an SLE patient treated with second-line therapy and red blood cell transfusions. The patient was a 49-year-old woman who presented with the main complaint of swelling in both legs. According to the medical history, the patient experienced petechia, abdominal distension, body weakness, and weight gain. No reports of joint pain, diarrhea, constipation, fever, shortness of breath, or yellowish skin were made. Before being referred to Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital in Surabaya, Indonesia, the patient experienced high blood pressure and body swelling that were unresponsive to treatment. Once the diagnosis of AIHA was confirmed, the patient was set to receive second-line therapy and red blood cell transfusions. At the conclusion of the therapy, the patient exhibited favorable outcomes. Highlights: This paper presents the management of autoimmune hemolytic anemia in systemic lupus erythematosus, which has been understudied in Indonesia. This paper provides additional evidence regarding the indications and outcomes of red blood cell transfusion in a case of autoimmune hemolytic anemia.
Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) may indicate the first manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is estimated that the incidence of AIHA is around 10% in patients with SLE. The first-line therapy for AIHA is corticosteroids. Nevertheless, a second-line therapy may be considered if an adequate response is not obtained. Transfusion indication in AIHA patients do not differ from other types of anemia. These indications include the degree of hemolysis, the progression of anemia, and clinical symptoms. However, blood transfusion for AIHA patients is challenging due to the limited availability of serologically compatible blood. In addition, AIHA patients who receive transfusions have an increased risk of experiencing hemolytic transfusion reactions. In this paper, we aimed to present a case report on the diagnosis of AIHA in an SLE patient treated with second-line therapy and red blood cell transfusions. The patient was a 49-year-old woman who presented with the main complaint of swelling in both legs. According to the medical history, the patient experienced petechia, abdominal distension, body weakness, and weight gain. No reports of joint pain, diarrhea, constipation, fever, shortness of breath, or yellowish skin were made. Before being referred to Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital in Surabaya, Indonesia, the patient experienced high blood pressure and body swelling that were unresponsive to treatment. Once the diagnosis of AIHA was confirmed, the patient was set to receive second-line therapy and red blood cell transfusions. At the conclusion of the therapy, the patient exhibited favorable outcomes. Highlights: This paper presents the management of autoimmune hemolytic anemia in systemic lupus erythematosus, which has been understudied in Indonesia. This paper provides additional evidence regarding the indications and outcomes of red blood cell transfusion in a case of autoimmune hemolytic anemia.
Background. Pre-transfusion testing is done to avoid transfusion morbidity from unexpected RBC antibodies. Available commercial kits from Western brands may not consider racial differences in antibody frequencies between East/Southeast Asians and Western populations. The limited number of blood banks in the Philippines precludes research on RBC antibody screening and identification in the country. Objective. This study aimed to compare RBC antibody screening and identification methods in patients at a tertiary hospital in the Philippines, assess the frequency of major blood group antibodies using both techniques, and review clinical histories of discrepant and nonspecific cases. Methodology. Retrospective review showed 118 cases with both screening and identification tests using both conventional tube-based technique and column agglutination or gel-based technique. Antibody frequencies and discrepant or nonspecific results were recorded. Concordance rates were calculated, and differences between the two methods were analyzed using 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Clinical histories of discrepant and nonspecific cases were also reviewed. Results. The most frequent major blood group was Rh (41 cases or 34.7%), followed by MNS (34 cases or 28.8%) and Kidd (15 cases or 12.7%). The most common antibody was Anti-E (24 cases or 20.3%), followed by Anti-Mia (19 cases or 16.1%), and Anti-M and Anti-c (12 cases each, or 10.2% each). The concordance rate for screening was statistically significant at 72%. Concordance rate for identification was 59.3%, with significant difference in identifying Anti-Mia. Clinical histories for discrepant or nonspecific cases showed previous transfusions, pregnancy, lymphoproliferative conditions, and certain medications. Conclusion. Statistically significant differences between the two methods were found, with the gel-based technique identifying more Anti-Mia cases. Negative results from the tube-based method do not fully exclude Anti-Mia. These discrepancies highlight the benefit of using both methods for comprehensive RBC antibody screening and identification, done as a complement to the other.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.