2022
DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2022.0065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: imaging techniques for diagnosis and management

Abstract: Pancreatic cancer is a leading cause of death from cancer but only a minority of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas are eligible for curative resection. The increasing role of neoadjuvant therapy provides hope of improving outcomes. However, progress is also reliant on advances in imaging that can identify disease earlier and accurately assess treatment response. Computed tomography remains the cornerstone in evaluation of resectability, offering excellent spatial resolution. However, in high-risk… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cancer Alliance Queensland found that where stage was recorded in multidisciplinary team meeting notes, it was generally in relation to resectability rather than TNM stage. There was no evidence in imaging reports of the use of standard templates to capture tumour characteristics required to define resectability and cancer stage, such as tumour location, vascular and lymph node involvement, and encasement of nearby structures [ 25 , 26 ]. The complexity and multiple dependencies that are assessed in defining resectability status using imaging means that cancer registry staff are unlikely to be able to determine resectability status from the imaging report.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancer Alliance Queensland found that where stage was recorded in multidisciplinary team meeting notes, it was generally in relation to resectability rather than TNM stage. There was no evidence in imaging reports of the use of standard templates to capture tumour characteristics required to define resectability and cancer stage, such as tumour location, vascular and lymph node involvement, and encasement of nearby structures [ 25 , 26 ]. The complexity and multiple dependencies that are assessed in defining resectability status using imaging means that cancer registry staff are unlikely to be able to determine resectability status from the imaging report.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%