2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2009.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pancreatic Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration: Complication rate and clinical course in a single centre

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
53
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study by Carrara and colleagues reported a duodenal perforation rate of 0.09% in a series of 3296 patients who underwent EUS with fine-needle aspiration [Carrara et al 2010]. The data in the literature on surgical management of these perforations are not currently comforting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A recent study by Carrara and colleagues reported a duodenal perforation rate of 0.09% in a series of 3296 patients who underwent EUS with fine-needle aspiration [Carrara et al 2010]. The data in the literature on surgical management of these perforations are not currently comforting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The overall complication rate of EUS-FNA is reported to be <1% in large centers. In one study, among 1,034 patients who underwent pancreatic EUS-FNA, the complications included 10 (0.96%) cases of hemorrhage, two (0.19%) cases of acute pancreatitis and one (0.09%) case of duodenal perforation (23). It has been reported that EUS-FNA is a useful and safe method for evaluating pancreatic masses, with a high feasibility rate even when the lesions are small (24).…”
Section: A B C Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 Duodenal perforation developed in 0.2% to 1% during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), 23,24 0.022% during diagnostic endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and 0.09% during EUS-fine needle aspiration. 25 Stapfer et al 26 proposed the classification of ERCP-related perforation as type 1: injury of lateral duodenal wall, type 2: injury at sphincter of Oddi, type 3: ductal injury, and type 4: retroperitoneal air alone. The proportion of ERCP-related perforation in each type were 34.5% in type 1, 31.3% in type 2, 23% in type 3, and 0.8% in type 4.…”
Section: 15mentioning
confidence: 99%