1984
DOI: 10.1016/0735-6757(84)90076-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pancreatic injury associated with interposed abdominal compressions in pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon has been reported to be a frequent finding when thrombolytic treatment is unsuccessful. 5 In their bibliographic review, Silber et al did not mention these three reports that we feel support the conclusions that are drawn from their study.…”
Section: Thrombolysis As the First Line Of Therapy For Cardiac Valve mentioning
confidence: 47%
“…This phenomenon has been reported to be a frequent finding when thrombolytic treatment is unsuccessful. 5 In their bibliographic review, Silber et al did not mention these three reports that we feel support the conclusions that are drawn from their study.…”
Section: Thrombolysis As the First Line Of Therapy For Cardiac Valve mentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Only one isolated case report of traumatic pancreatitis in a child 45 describes local trauma from abdominal compression during CPR. These data compare favorably with the well-known and frequent incidence of rib fracture and pulmonary contusion from chest compression during CPR [55][56][57] .…”
Section: Complications Of Iac-cprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This case of necropsy-confirmed pancreatic injury occurred in a child receiving interposed abdominal compression during CPR. 38 Initial concerns regarding the possibility of more frequent emesis during IAC-CPR than during conventional CPR have remained unsubstantiated. All three randomized clinical trials previously cited failed to show a difference in rates of emesis between the IAC and standard CPR groups.…”
Section: Clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%