2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70374-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pancreatic squamous carcinoma mimicking a bleeding duodenal ulcer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Eight cases of squamous cell carcinoma Pancreatic have been reported in the literature since 1990 [1]- [3]. In the classification of tumors outlined by WHO [4], squamous cell carcinoma falls under adenosquamous tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Eight cases of squamous cell carcinoma Pancreatic have been reported in the literature since 1990 [1]- [3]. In the classification of tumors outlined by WHO [4], squamous cell carcinoma falls under adenosquamous tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In CT scan, there is often a peripheral contrast in the lesion after injection of contrast [7]. These tumors, often voluminous, have grim prognosis at diagnosis, with loco regional and lymph nodeinvasion very common [8], as well as metastases, which were reported in six other cases in the literature [3] [9] [10]. Baylor et al reported a 5-year survivalrate of less than 1% [11], Beyer et al a 1-year survival of 4.8% [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cases are described in the literature only as case reports [2-11]. In view of its rarity, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the pancreas is presumed to be metastatic from another primary site, until proven otherwise [1,8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have identified (Table 1) an additional 14 cases diagnosed ante-mortem since 2005 and a further case diagnosed ante-mortem in 2000 by Fonseca et al . [11], which was not included in the excellent review by Brown et al . [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%