2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

11
141
2
24

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
11
141
2
24
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been a debate regarding PG versus PJ, but the current evidence does not suggest superiority of one technique over the other [57][58][59][60]. It is possible to achieve fistula rates of less than 5-10 % irrespective of the technique used.…”
Section: Pancreaticogastrostomy (Pg) Versus Pancreaticojejunostomy (Pj)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a debate regarding PG versus PJ, but the current evidence does not suggest superiority of one technique over the other [57][58][59][60]. It is possible to achieve fistula rates of less than 5-10 % irrespective of the technique used.…”
Section: Pancreaticogastrostomy (Pg) Versus Pancreaticojejunostomy (Pj)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings of PG have been compared to PJ in more than a dozen retrospective studies which almost invariably have demonstrated the superiority of PG. A recent meta-analysis has reported that average pancreatic fistula rate was significantly lower (3.7%) after PG than PJ (16.5%) with a significant difference in mortality of 3% after PG compared with 9% after PJ and lower intra-abdominal complications than PJ [16][17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digestive tract partner, stitching technique and material used are also discussed [1, 9,12]. However, there is no consensus on any of the mentioned points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%