2023
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13466-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pancreatoduodenectomy Following Preoperative Biliary Drainage Using Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Choledochoduodenostomy Versus a Transpapillary Stent: A Multicenter Comparative Cohort Study of the ACHBT–FRENCH–SFED Intergroup

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the fact that five patients underwent surgical resection after a median of 34 days could have led to an underestimation; however, considering stent dysfunction occurred after a median of 6 days, this factor is expected to be of limited influence. Data on surgical resection after EUS-CDS are still scarce; however, we believe the available data show no reason to be reluctant to perform EUS-CDS in operable patients while awaiting further studies in this specific patient group [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the fact that five patients underwent surgical resection after a median of 34 days could have led to an underestimation; however, considering stent dysfunction occurred after a median of 6 days, this factor is expected to be of limited influence. Data on surgical resection after EUS-CDS are still scarce; however, we believe the available data show no reason to be reluctant to perform EUS-CDS in operable patients while awaiting further studies in this specific patient group [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Data on surgical resection after EUS-CDS is still scarce however we believe the available data shows no reason to be reluctant with EUS-CDS in operable patients while awaiting further studies in this specific patient category. [19] Although the rate of cholangitis due to stent dysfunction was high, the course of the disease was generally mild. The vast majority of patients were successfully treated with antibiotics and/or endoscopic re-intervention.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is increasing evidence that EUS-BD does not hinder subsequent pancreaticoduodenectomy, although this only applies to EUS-CDD as the choledochoduodenostomy tract and stent lies within the surgical resection field. This has been demonstrated by several studies ( 30 , 32 , 49 , 62 , 63 ).. Janet, et al. also included a comparator cohort group of patients who underwent ERCP and demonstrated a lower rate of post-operative complications in patients who had EUS-CDD (77.3% vs 93.7%, p=0.01) but no differences in the R0 resection rates, overall survival and progression free survival rates between both groups ( 63 ).…”
Section: Eus-guided Interventions In Pancreatic Cancermentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This has been demonstrated by several studies ( 30 , 32 , 49 , 62 , 63 ).. Janet, et al. also included a comparator cohort group of patients who underwent ERCP and demonstrated a lower rate of post-operative complications in patients who had EUS-CDD (77.3% vs 93.7%, p=0.01) but no differences in the R0 resection rates, overall survival and progression free survival rates between both groups ( 63 ). With the caveat that this was a retrospective study, it adds to the body of evidence supporting EUS-CDD as a viable modality of biliary drainage in patients with operable disease, and instill the confidence in developing future RCTs comparing EUS-CDD against ERCP as a primary modality of biliary decompression in patients with resectable disease.…”
Section: Eus-guided Interventions In Pancreatic Cancermentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Additionally, patients who received EUS-guided biliary drainage had lower rates of reintervention before surgery (9% vs. 38%) compared to ERCP. Similarly, a retrospective multicenter study ( n = 156, 53.8% PDAC) from Europe compared biliary drainage via EUS-CD using a LAMS with SEMS placement via ERCP [ 67 ]. All patients successfully went on to receive the Whipple procedure.…”
Section: Impact Of Therapeutic Eus On Subsequent Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%