Pandemia y guerra: narrativas de crisis y liderazgo. Análisis de las estrategias discursivas presidenciales en el inicio de la pandemia del COVID-19

Tornero, Josè Manuel Pérez; Lladó, Carles Marín; Cervi, Laura

doi:10.4185/rlcs-2021-1500

Cited by 11 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The largest cluster (in red) includes 23 items and is mainly related to crisis response strategies, strategic communication, situational crisis communication, and communication on social media. The linkages to terms such as image repair, internal communication, and corporate communication may indicate that crisis communication concerns related to organizations can provide multiple cobenefits and strengthen public relations (Coombs, 2021;Tornero et al, 2021).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Few papers have intensively reviewed crisis communication during the pandemic and infectious disease outbreaks (MacKay et al, 2022;Malecki et al, 2021;Sadri et al, 2021) or captured risk and disaster communication (Bradley et al, 2014;Goerlandt et al, 2020). Lately, the focus has shifted toward using virtual channels and space (Eriksson, 2018;Liu-Lastres, 2022;Tornero et al, 2021;Wang and Dong, 2017;Yang, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mapping crisis communication in the communication research: what we know and what we don’t know

Upadhyay,

Upadhyay

2023

Humanit Soc Sci Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of crisis communication research from 1968 to 2022, utilizing bibliometric methods to illuminate its trajectories, thematic shifts, and future possibilities. Additionally, it presents foundational themes such as crisis communication and social media, health communication, crisis and leadership, and reputation and advertising. This analysis offers not only historical insights but also serves as a roadmap for future research endeavors. Furthermore, this study critically evaluates over five decades of scholarship by unveiling the intellectual, social, and conceptual contours of the field while highlighting thematic evolutions. Employing diverse bibliometric indices, this research quantifies authors’ and nations’ productivity and impact. Through co-word analysis, four thematic clusters emerge, capturing the dynamic nature of crisis communication research. However, the study also reveals limited collaboration among authors, primarily localized, indicating room for enhanced cross-border cooperation and exploration of emerging themes. The study’s social network analysis sheds light on key actors and entities within the crisis communication realm, underscoring opportunities to fortify global networks for a robust crisis communication spectrum. Beyond academic curiosity, these insights hold practical implications for policymakers, scholars, and practitioners, offering a blueprint to enhance crisis communication’s effectiveness. This study’s findings can be considered as a reference point for future studies in crisis communication.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping crisis communication in the communication research: what we know and what we don’t know

Upadhyay,

Upadhyay

2023

Humanit Soc Sci Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In their semiotic analysis of the speeches of Italian, French, and Spanish presidents during the pandemic [27], concluded that the political leaders discursively used the relationship between science and politics to strengthen or justify the strategies chosen. [22] analyzed the Dutch Prime Minister's press conferences and the related Twitter responses in the first stage of the pandemic.…”

Section: Science and Politics During The Covid-19 Pandemicmentioning

confidence: 99%

The role of science in a crisis: Talks by political leaders during the COVID-19 pandemic

Loner

Fattorini²,

Bucchi³

2023

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During the COVID-19 pandemic, science has been prominently featured in institutional communication and political agendas as never before. Governments substantially relied on scientific experts to analyze pandemic trends, develop anti-COVID-19 vaccines and adopt containment strategies. In this paper, we analyze speeches by three political leaders–Boris Johnson (Prime Minister, UK), Sergio Mattarella (President of the Republic, Italy), and Ursula von der Leyen (President, European Commission)–between February 20, 2020, and February 20, 2022, to identify how science was addressed and framed. The results of the quantitative and qualitative exploration of the speeches highlight three main ways in which political leaders view science: a national pride narrative–i.e., science as an instrument and indicator of national pride and international standing of the country; an ethical narrative–i.e., science as an agent of social growth; an integration narrative–i.e., science as a driving force of both European integration and stronger collaboration between knowledge production and industry. The predominant narrative varies in relation to the political leaders’ different institutional contexts and roles.

show abstract

“…According to the research of José Manuel Pérez Tornero, they have explained that when the public of a country is threatened by external factors such as the epidemic, the leadership of the government and national leaders will play a vital role The determination, faith, and dedication of good leaders will lead the people to overcome the epidemic in all aspects, and overcome the rumors of the epidemic. However, in addition to individual heroism, how to generally improve the government’s ability to refute rumors is a very important link in the prevention and control of epidemic rumors ( Pérez Tornero et al, 2021 ). Ciara M finds that no effects have been formed by providing a general warning about the dangers of the fake stories, regardless of the framing of the warning in positive or negative terms ( Greene & Murphy, 2021 ).…”

Section: Theoretical Background and Research Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

How can we implement targeted policies of rumor governance? An empirical study based on survey experiment of COVID-19

Liao

Xie

et al. 2023

Chinese Public Administration Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since early 2020, COVID-19 has been a major public security crisis that has had an enormous impact on the world. With the spread of the epidemic, rumors occur, some of which have even caused public panic. They have greatly affected the government’s efforts of epidemic prevention and thus urgently need to be evaluated. This study aimed to examine how to make flexible use of different policy tools to govern rumors based on their different characteristics. From the perspective of behavioral public policy, this study observes the effectiveness of various behavioral policy tools in rumor governance, hoping to explore the optimal solution of rumor governance from the perspective of micro public psychology. The survey experiment shows that individual behavior-related rumors (hereafter referred to as IBRs) are easier to be governed than epidemic progress-related rumors (hereafter referred to as EPRs) are, and that quick response is more effective than non-quick response. Through interaction analysis, it is known that in the governance of IBRs, nudge is more effective in rapid response, while in the context of non-quick response, boost outperforms nudge in rumor governance. A similar phenomenon can be seen in the scenario of EPR governance, despite a tinier difference in effectiveness compared with that of IBRs. The study enlightens us that rumor refutation requires not only people’s disbelief in and restraint on rumors, but also the implementation of science-based targeted policies. Based on the conclusion, this study puts forward suggestions on implementing targeted policies of rumor governance.

show abstract

Pandemia y guerra: narrativas de crisis y liderazgo. Análisis de las estrategias discursivas presidenciales en el inicio de la pandemia del COVID-19

Cited by 11 publications

References 18 publications

Mapping crisis communication in the communication research: what we know and what we don’t know

Mapping crisis communication in the communication research: what we know and what we don’t know

The role of science in a crisis: Talks by political leaders during the COVID-19 pandemic

How can we implement targeted policies of rumor governance? An empirical study based on survey experiment of COVID-19

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About