2011
DOI: 10.20377/jfr-235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Panel Analysis of Intimate Relationships and Family Dynamics (pairfam): Conceptual framework and design

Abstract: This article introduces the DFG-funded “Panel Analysis of Intimate Relationships and Family Dynamics” (pairfam) study, which was initiated to provide an extended empirical basis for advances in family research. Within the context of challenges in couples and family research, we address the major substantive fields covered by the pairfam panel: couple dynamics and partnership stability, childbearing, parenting and child development, and intergenerational relationships. Then we present the conceptual framework a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
204
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 321 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
204
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This study uses cross-sectional data from 2,529 opposite-sex couples from Wave 5 of the German Family Panel (pairfam) study ( Huiniuk et al, 2011 ). In 2008/2009 (Wave 1) of the study, 3,729 anchor-partner pairs were recruited.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study uses cross-sectional data from 2,529 opposite-sex couples from Wave 5 of the German Family Panel (pairfam) study ( Huiniuk et al, 2011 ). In 2008/2009 (Wave 1) of the study, 3,729 anchor-partner pairs were recruited.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Analysen basieren auf längsschnittlichen Daten des Beziehungs-und Familienpanels pairfam [14] und der online durchgeführten pairfam COVID-19-Zusatzstudie [15]. Dabei handelt es sich um eine…”
Section: Datenunclassified
“…Within these waves, the panel provides information on family, educational, and labour market histories as well as a broad range of measurements regarding the participant's relationship life, work life and the interweaving of both dimensions. The anchor's current partners were interviewed separately using a slightly shorter questionnaire (Huinink et al 2011).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%