2018
DOI: 10.1177/1536867x1801800111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Panel Unit-root Tests for Heteroskedastic Panels

Abstract: In this article, we describe the command xtpurt, which implements the heteroskedasticity-robust panel unit-root tests suggested in Herwartz and Siedenburg (2008, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 53: 137–150), Demetrescu and Hanck (2012a, Economics Letters 117: 10–13), and, recently, Herwartz, Maxand, and Walle (2017, Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research Discussion Papers 314). While the former two tests are robust to time-varying volatility when the data contain only an i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 presents Clemente et al [ 120 ], Levin et al [ 121 ], and Herwartz et al [ 122 , 123 ] panel unit root test results. The nature of our data demands a battery of robust panel unit root tests since it is plagued with traits of heteroscedasticity and structural breaks possibly emanating from shocks triggered by currency and economic transitions over the sample period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 presents Clemente et al [ 120 ], Levin et al [ 121 ], and Herwartz et al [ 122 , 123 ] panel unit root test results. The nature of our data demands a battery of robust panel unit root tests since it is plagued with traits of heteroscedasticity and structural breaks possibly emanating from shocks triggered by currency and economic transitions over the sample period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, first, we employ second generation panel unit root tests to check the unconditional forms of Gibrat's law in Slovenian farm growth. In addition, we apply different heteroskedasticity-robust panel unit-root tests suggested in Herwartz and Siedenburg (2008), Demetrescu andHanck (2012), andHerwartz, Maxand, Raters, andWalle (2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test yields more reliable results when dealing with disturbance processes that may exhibit heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation in our dataset [103,104]. Most panel unit root tests, including the Breitung and Das test and Levin-Lin-Chu unit root test, assume homoskedasticity [105] and hence were not applicable.…”
Section: Unit Root and Cointegration Testsmentioning
confidence: 97%