2020
DOI: 10.1144/sp503-2020-96
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pannotia: in defence of its existence and geodynamic significance

Abstract: The status of Pannotia as an Ediacaran supercontinent, or even its mere existence as a coherent large landmass, is controversial. The effect of its hypothesized amalgamation is generally ignored in mantle convection models claiming the transition from Rodinia to Pangaea represents a single supercontinent cycle. We apply three geodynamic scenarios to Pannotia amalgamation that are tested using regional

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 205 publications
(285 reference statements)
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following we assume that these thermochemical piles can persist at the core‐mantle boundary on billion‐year timescales (e.g., Jones et al., 2021; Yan et al., 2020); however, the outcome of the following model would not change if the source of the Kaavi‐Kuopio kimberlites was located in other deep Earth structures where plumes are generated. Despite the contention around LLSVP longevity and fixity, there is agreement for the role of mantle plumes, which emanated from the margins of LLSVPs or other lower mantle sources, in the emplacement of the contemporaneous CIMP and opening the Iapetus ocean (e.g., Ernst & Bell, 2010; Murphy et al., 2021; Robert et al., 2021; Tegner et al., 2019). We also advocate here for a role of these upwellings in the petrogenesis and geochemical evolution of the Kaavi‐Kuopio kimberlites (Figure 4; Figure 10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following we assume that these thermochemical piles can persist at the core‐mantle boundary on billion‐year timescales (e.g., Jones et al., 2021; Yan et al., 2020); however, the outcome of the following model would not change if the source of the Kaavi‐Kuopio kimberlites was located in other deep Earth structures where plumes are generated. Despite the contention around LLSVP longevity and fixity, there is agreement for the role of mantle plumes, which emanated from the margins of LLSVPs or other lower mantle sources, in the emplacement of the contemporaneous CIMP and opening the Iapetus ocean (e.g., Ernst & Bell, 2010; Murphy et al., 2021; Robert et al., 2021; Tegner et al., 2019). We also advocate here for a role of these upwellings in the petrogenesis and geochemical evolution of the Kaavi‐Kuopio kimberlites (Figure 4; Figure 10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the Phanerozoic, our model suggests that TP decreased more gradually to reach the current average of ~1350 °C. This likely reflects a reduced subduction rate due to the assembly of the supercontinent Pannotia/Gondwana 45,46 at the end of the Neoproterozoic, as tracked by widespread Pan-African orogenesis 47,48 . Assembly of Pannotia/Gondwana would have provided thermal insulation below the amalgamated supercontinent, further slowing mantle cooling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Ga, supercontinent. The debate on the existence of Pannotia has just been revived recently for example by Nance and Murphy (2018) or Kroner et al (2020) and in particular Murphy et al (2020). Keeping this issue in mind, however, the present study uses the widely accepted term Rodinia, but reserves the possibility to change the name when reconstructions back to 1 Ga or more will be made.…”
Section: Rodinia or Pannotia? Preliminary Remarksmentioning
confidence: 98%