2023
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-4gqxm
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paper-based laser-pyrolyzed electrofluidics: an electrochemical platform for capillary-driven diagnostic bioassays

Abstract: Microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (uPADs) are indispensable tools for disease diagnostics. The integration of electronic components into uPADs enables new device functionalities and facilitates the development of complex quantitative assays. Unfortunately, current electrode fabrication methods often hinder capillary flow, considerably restricting uPAD design architectures. Here, we present laser-induced graphenization as an approach to fabricate porous electrodes embedded into cellulose paper. The re… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Within capillary-driven microfluidic devices, the use of electrodes for flow sensing has been restricted to detecting the flow front through changes in resistance or capacitance. 23,24 Although the flow front behaviour may serve as an indicator for RDT failure, 25 it cannot provide information on injected volumes or any aspect of multiinjection testing procedures. Several flow sensing solutions have been developed for pressure-driven microfluidic systems, 26 involving, for example, deformable membranes, 27 microstructures, 28,29 or microfabricated thermal sensors; 30 however, these microfabrication approaches are incompatible with paper-based systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Within capillary-driven microfluidic devices, the use of electrodes for flow sensing has been restricted to detecting the flow front through changes in resistance or capacitance. 23,24 Although the flow front behaviour may serve as an indicator for RDT failure, 25 it cannot provide information on injected volumes or any aspect of multiinjection testing procedures. Several flow sensing solutions have been developed for pressure-driven microfluidic systems, 26 involving, for example, deformable membranes, 27 microstructures, 28,29 or microfabricated thermal sensors; 30 however, these microfabrication approaches are incompatible with paper-based systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%