2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paper recommendation based on heterogeneous network embedding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several other studies have used data from scientific articles, such as topical relevance, citation proximity, article tags, etc. for recommendations in a network-based framework (Ali et al, 2020). Bibliographic coupling has also been used to create a co-citation based network, alongside a weighted in-text citation scoring method, to increase suggestions of most commonly cited articles (Habib & Afzal, 2019).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other studies have used data from scientific articles, such as topical relevance, citation proximity, article tags, etc. for recommendations in a network-based framework (Ali et al, 2020). Bibliographic coupling has also been used to create a co-citation based network, alongside a weighted in-text citation scoring method, to increase suggestions of most commonly cited articles (Habib & Afzal, 2019).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these categories are defined precisely but graph-based approaches are not always characterised concisely: Content-based filtering (CBF) methods are said to be ones where user interest is inferred by observing their historic interactions with papers [ 9 , 16 , 58 ]. Recommendations are composed by observing features of papers and users [ 5 ]. In collaborative filtering (CF) systems the preferences of users similar to a current one are observed to identify likely relevant publications [ 9 , 16 , 58 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ST_RippleNet not only introduces the KGE method into recommendations but also mines potential user information. In this paper, when ST_RippleNet is applied to music, books and movies, it is found that compared with the current mainstream recommendation [19] methods, ST_RippleNet achieves AUC gains of 6.4% to 37.4%, 0.8% to 18.4% and 0.4% to 41.2%, respectively, and ACC gains of 7.6% to 31.9%, 4.7% to 24.2% and 0.9% to 44.7%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%