2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29551-6_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paper Recommendation with Item-Level Collaborative Memory Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[109] Graph-based [110] Hybrid [111] Hybrid [117] Hybrid [118] N e t w o r k × [123] Hybrid also utilise historic user-interaction data or descriptions of paper features (see, e.g. Li et al [57] who describe their approach as network-based while using a graph structure, textual components and user profiles) which would render them as either CF or CBF also.…”
Section: Meta Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[109] Graph-based [110] Hybrid [111] Hybrid [117] Hybrid [118] N e t w o r k × [123] Hybrid also utilise historic user-interaction data or descriptions of paper features (see, e.g. Li et al [57] who describe their approach as network-based while using a graph structure, textual components and user profiles) which would render them as either CF or CBF also.…”
Section: Meta Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the observed paper recommendation systems, six were general systems or methods which were only applied on the domain of paper recommendation [3,4,24,60,118,121]. Two were targeting explicit set-based recommendation of publications where only all papers in the set together satisfy users' information needs [60,61], two recommend multiple papers [42,71] (e.g.…”
Section: Current Categorisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, if there were interactions between users and items in implicit collaborative filtering, it was recorded as 1, otherwise 0. However, 1 or 0 did not indicate positive or negative factors between users and items that generated the interaction [35]. According to users' query keywords, CF approaches can effectively recommend papers to users, but these approaches are generally limited by some problems, e.g., the cold start problem and the data sparsity problem [36].…”
Section: Collaborative Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%