1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1990.tb02136.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Papillary eccrine adenoma-a light-microscopic and immunohistochemical study

Abstract: We report a case of papillary eccrine adenoma. This benign cutaneous tumour had a diagnostic microscopic appearance that consisted of multiple dilated ducts lined by two or more layers of cells. The inner layer often formed intraluminal papillary projections of variable complexity. The lumina were filled by eosinophilic amorphous material. Immunoperoxidase studies showed carcino-embryonic antigen in the luminal border of the ducts, but S-100 protein was absent for tumoral ducts. We discuss the eccrine and apoc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is disagreement about the direction of differentiation (2), and authors variously favor a ductal (13)(14)(15), a glandular (16,17), or a dual ductalglandular (18) differentiation. Many authors have proposed theories based on the presence of SlOO protein detected by immunohistochemical staining with polyclonal antibody against SlOO protein (14)(15)(16)(17). However, there are different conclusions about the cellular differentiation of PEA because SlOO protein has not been consistently demonstrated in PEA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is disagreement about the direction of differentiation (2), and authors variously favor a ductal (13)(14)(15), a glandular (16,17), or a dual ductalglandular (18) differentiation. Many authors have proposed theories based on the presence of SlOO protein detected by immunohistochemical staining with polyclonal antibody against SlOO protein (14)(15)(16)(17). However, there are different conclusions about the cellular differentiation of PEA because SlOO protein has not been consistently demonstrated in PEA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A connection to the epidermis or infundibulum has often been demonstrated in published cases of TA, yet these lesions were variously interpreted as PEA or TAA, not as SCAP. [1][2][3]9,14,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Connection of the tumors to the infundibulum has been used by some authorities as an argument to support apocrine differentiation. 2,3 One of the observers diagnosed a lesion in this series as SCAP even if it exhibited a single focus in which glandular elements were in continuity to the follicular infundibulum (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Squamous metaplasia has only rarely been specifically commented upon in the previously published material on tubular apocrine adenoma/papillary eccrine adenoma, although the descriptions of solid epithelial nodules, dilated cysts containing laminated keratin or squamous-cell-lined cysts almost certainly correspond to this phenomenon. [27][28][29][30] Murphy and Elder 30 suggested that dilated cysts containing laminated keratin may represent recapitulation of intraepidermal eccrine duct formation. Because an otherwise well-formed basal/ myoepithelial cell layer was not visible in the nodules that had fully undergone squamous metaplasia, we suggest that hyperplasia and/or metaplasia of basal/myoepithelial cells is responsible for the remarkable immature and mature squamous cell differentiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%