Recurrent papillary glioneuronal tumor presenting as a ganglioglioma with the BRAF V600E mutationWe previously reported the rare case of a papillary glioneuronal tumor (PGNT) with high mitotic index and minigemistocytes in a 12-year-old boy in Neuropathology.
1Although PGNT is considered a benign brain tumor, several cases with pathologically and clinically aggressive features have been reported. Given the histologic features of malignancy in our reported case, that is, necrosis, microvascular proliferation, minigemistocytes and high Ki-67 proliferative index (14%), we continued careful follow-up by MRI after gross total resection of the tumor. Thus, a small recurrent tumor was observed by MRI at the site of the tumor cavity 26 months after the first operation. The tumor was well demarcated and homogeneously enhanced by gadolinium, and grew gradually over 5 months (Fig. 1A, B). Although it was small and seen as benign, we performed a second surgical resection of the tumor.The histological examination demonstrated proliferation of mature and dysmorphic ganglion cells and microcalcification. Pseudopapillary structures and minigemistocytes that were observed in the first operative specimen were absent ( Fig. 2A, B). Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were mostly negative for GFAP (6F2, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark; 1:400) but positive for synaptophysin (SY38, Dako; 1:500) (Fig. 2C, D). The cells were positive for neurospecific enolase (BBS/NC/VI-H14, Dako; 1:100) and S-100 (polyclonal, Dako; 1:1000), partially positive for neurofilament (2F11, Dako; 1:1000) and oligodendrocyte transcription factor 2 (Olig2; polyclonal, IBL, Gunma, Japan; 1:300), and negative for CD34 (QBEnd10, Dako; 1:600). The Ki-67 (MIB-1, Dako; 1:300) proliferative index was 2% in the most proliferative area. Although the expression of GFAP was minimal in the tumor, there was a small area with GFAP-positive tumor cells. Therefore, a pathological diagnosis of ganglioglioma was made.Because the pathology was determined to be ganglioglioma, we further investigated for the presence of the BRAF V600E mutation by immunohistochemistry in the first and second surgical specimens, using an anti-BRAF V600E antibody (VE1, Spring Bioscience, Pleasanton, CA, USA; 1:1000). Interestingly, mutated-BRAF protein was observed both in the first and second surgical specimens (Fig. 3A-C). In the first surgical specimen, both the pseudopapillary and desmoplastic areas showed mutated-BRAF expression only in the tumor cells and not in vascular endothelial cells and infiltratelymphocytes. Neuronal and ganglionic tumor cells showed a more intense staining of mutated-BRAF than glial tumor cells. In the second surgical specimen, all the tumor cells of neuronal or ganglionic morphology demonstrated strong mutated-BRAF expression. Based on these findings, we speculated that a neuronal component of the PGNT persisted after the first operation and regrew as a secondary ganglioglioma.The pathogenesis of PGNT is unknown. Myung et al. reported that two patients with PGNT were tested ...