2020 IEEE 91st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020-Spring) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/vtc2020-spring48590.2020.9128513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PAPR Reduction Scheme for Deep Learning-Based Communication Systems Using Autoencoders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, ML techniques have also been used to lower out-of-band (OOB) emissions. A DL-based technique in terms of autoencoder has been employed for PAPR reduction [21]. A combination of extended SLM and autoencoder has also been proposed for reducing PAPR in DC-biased optical OFDM systems [22].…”
Section: For Papr Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, ML techniques have also been used to lower out-of-band (OOB) emissions. A DL-based technique in terms of autoencoder has been employed for PAPR reduction [21]. A combination of extended SLM and autoencoder has also been proposed for reducing PAPR in DC-biased optical OFDM systems [22].…”
Section: For Papr Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Jiang and others [9] proposed a sparsity‐learning‐based iterative algorithm for PAPR reduction to compensate for the distortion of clipped signals. Likewise, a deep neural network (DNN) architecture was provided by Vahdat to reduce the PAPR in autoencoder‐based communication systems, and others in [13]. Although these schemes displayed varying reduction levels in the PAPR, they showed insufficient improvement in either BER or computational complexity in addition to the requirement for a recovery process to be provided at the receiver in specific cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of these techniques have shortcomings, such as poor system performance (bit error rate [BER]) and/or computational complexity. Well-known examples are distortionless schemes (e.g., SLM and PTS families) [2][3][4][5][6][7], clipping and filtering schemes [8,9], tone injection (TI) [10], active constellation extension (ACE) [11], interleaving [12], encoding family schemes [13], and artificial intelligent families [13][14][15][16][17][18]. Unfortunately, none of these solutions can guarantee the achievement of all standards, that is, acceptable levels of PAPR, BER performance, and computational complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, performance is not guaranteed if the actual channel deviates from the training model. A modification to this method was proposed in [13], which replaced the two-variable loss function with a single loss function designed to decode transmissions. A scaled 'tanh' activation function was used at the output of the encoder to limit PAPR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residual learning has already shown significant success in image processing [15]. Different from [12][13][14], the proposed method makes no changes to the receiver, thus making it channel agnostic. Furthermore, the training process has been modified to account for OOBE as well as in-band distortion, while the clipper ensures a deterministic peak amplitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%