2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10711-021-00665-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Para-Kähler-Einstein 4-manifolds and non-integrable twistor distributions

Abstract: We study the local geometry of 4-manifolds equipped with a para-Kähler-Einstein (pKE) metric, a special type of split-signature pseudo-Riemannian metric, and their associated twistor distribution, a rank 2 distribution on the 5-dimensional total space of the circle bundle of self-dual null 2-planes. For pKE metrics with non-zero scalar curvature this twistor distribution has exactly two integral leaves and is ‘maximally non-integrable’ on their complement, a so-called (2,3,5)-distribution. Our main result esta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is Theorem 4.2 and the metric (4.43) which is a general metric of the para-Kähler Einstein spaces for which SD Weyl tensor is algebraically special. The metric (4.43) depends on 4 functions of two variables like it was proved in [3]. The types {[III] e ⊗ [D] nn , [++, ++]} and {[N] e ⊗ [D] nn , [++, ++]} have been also found and they depend on 3 and 2 functions of two variables, respectively 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is Theorem 4.2 and the metric (4.43) which is a general metric of the para-Kähler Einstein spaces for which SD Weyl tensor is algebraically special. The metric (4.43) depends on 4 functions of two variables like it was proved in [3]. The types {[III] e ⊗ [D] nn , [++, ++]} and {[N] e ⊗ [D] nn , [++, ++]} have been also found and they depend on 3 and 2 functions of two variables, respectively 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…0 (4.45)Proof. C(3) = 0 implies A = 0 and C(2) = 0 yields (4.45) (compare (4.39)).Type{[N] e ⊗ [D] nn , [++, ++]} is a little more complicated. Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations