Abstract:Background. Drastic functional reorganization was observed in the ipsilateral primary motor cortex (M1) of a Paralympic long jumper with a unilateral below-knee amputation in our previous study. However, it remains unclear whether long-term para-sports are associated with ipsilateral M1 reorganization since only 1 athlete with amputation was investigated. Objective. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the long-term para-sports and ipsilateral M1 reorganization after lower limb amputation. … Show more
“…To further examine the relation between bilateral M1 activation and prosthesis use, Nakanish et al ( 12 ) recruited 30 individuals with unilateral lower limb amputations (14 transtibial and 16 transfemoral amputations) who regularly participated in sports activities and performed the same fMRI experiments as with Paralympic athletes. The authors found that 12 out of 30 participants demonstrated significant ipsilateral M1 activation, and there was a significant correlation ( P < 0.05) between years of participation in sports and the ipsilateral M1 activation level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another noteworthy result reported by Hordacre et al ( 13 ) was that the higher relative excitability of the ipsilateral M1 was associated with increased step-time variability for amputated and nonamputated limbs, suggesting that corticomotor projections from the ipsilateral M1 to alpha-motoneurons innervating the amputated limb quadriceps muscle would interfere with gait. It is uncertain whether the ipsilateral M1 activation on the amputated side observed in both Paralympic long jumpers and high jumpers is associated with higher prosthetic motor skills, although the result of Nakanishi et al ( 12 ) suggests that this activation is related to longer use due to sports activity. Future longitudinal studies are required to clarify the functional relevance of higher ipsilateral M1 excitability.…”
Use-dependent and impairment-specific plasticity after physical impairments are hypothesized to interact and enhance reorganization in the brains of athletes with physical impairments.
“…To further examine the relation between bilateral M1 activation and prosthesis use, Nakanish et al ( 12 ) recruited 30 individuals with unilateral lower limb amputations (14 transtibial and 16 transfemoral amputations) who regularly participated in sports activities and performed the same fMRI experiments as with Paralympic athletes. The authors found that 12 out of 30 participants demonstrated significant ipsilateral M1 activation, and there was a significant correlation ( P < 0.05) between years of participation in sports and the ipsilateral M1 activation level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another noteworthy result reported by Hordacre et al ( 13 ) was that the higher relative excitability of the ipsilateral M1 was associated with increased step-time variability for amputated and nonamputated limbs, suggesting that corticomotor projections from the ipsilateral M1 to alpha-motoneurons innervating the amputated limb quadriceps muscle would interfere with gait. It is uncertain whether the ipsilateral M1 activation on the amputated side observed in both Paralympic long jumpers and high jumpers is associated with higher prosthetic motor skills, although the result of Nakanishi et al ( 12 ) suggests that this activation is related to longer use due to sports activity. Future longitudinal studies are required to clarify the functional relevance of higher ipsilateral M1 excitability.…”
Use-dependent and impairment-specific plasticity after physical impairments are hypothesized to interact and enhance reorganization in the brains of athletes with physical impairments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.