2015
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226278315.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parables of Coercion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early and late modern participants in debates about the Moriscos have often marshaled the figure of the Morisco to their own scholarly and political objectives-to justify comparative Semitic philology in the 16th century or to drum up support for military excursions in North Africa in the 16th, 19th, and 20th centuries, for instance. Parallel examples of this simultaneous invention and deployment of the figure of the Morisco include 16th-century canon lawyers' participation in debates about the Moriscos in order to make the case for scholastic expertise as a tool of governance or to pursue the canonization of particular colleagues; late 16th-and early 17th-century historians similarly grappled with Morisco history in order to reimagine the methods and standards of evidence that then defined the craft of history (Fiume, 2014;Kimmel, 2015). There is no unmediated access to individuals' religious beliefs; nor is there any free passage through these partisan framings of the Morisco question into the cultural and religious realities of the Morisco him or herself.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early and late modern participants in debates about the Moriscos have often marshaled the figure of the Morisco to their own scholarly and political objectives-to justify comparative Semitic philology in the 16th century or to drum up support for military excursions in North Africa in the 16th, 19th, and 20th centuries, for instance. Parallel examples of this simultaneous invention and deployment of the figure of the Morisco include 16th-century canon lawyers' participation in debates about the Moriscos in order to make the case for scholastic expertise as a tool of governance or to pursue the canonization of particular colleagues; late 16th-and early 17th-century historians similarly grappled with Morisco history in order to reimagine the methods and standards of evidence that then defined the craft of history (Fiume, 2014;Kimmel, 2015). There is no unmediated access to individuals' religious beliefs; nor is there any free passage through these partisan framings of the Morisco question into the cultural and religious realities of the Morisco him or herself.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%