2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10468-010-9240-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parabolically Induced Representations of Graded Hecke Algebras

Abstract: We study the representation theory of graded Hecke algebras, starting from scratch and focusing on representations that are obtained by induction from a discrete series representation of a parabolic subalgebra. We determine all intertwining operators between such parabolically induced representations, and use them to parametrize the irreducible representations. Finally we describe the spectrum of a graded Hecke algebra as a topological space.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With Proposition 1.1, [Sol2,Appendix] becomes valid in our situation. The theorem is a reformulation of parts (d) and (e) of [Sol2,Theorem 11.2]. For completeness we note that the connecting homomorphism…”
Section: Twisted Group Algebras and Normal Subgroupsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…With Proposition 1.1, [Sol2,Appendix] becomes valid in our situation. The theorem is a reformulation of parts (d) and (e) of [Sol2,Theorem 11.2]. For completeness we note that the connecting homomorphism…”
Section: Twisted Group Algebras and Normal Subgroupsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Notice that the intertwining operators π(gu, Q, σ, t) depend algebraically on t ∈ T Q . This implies that, for every gu ∈ G, π(Q, σ, t) and π(gu(Q, σ, t)) have the same irreducible subquotients (counted with multiplicity), see [Sol3,Lemma 3.1.7] or [Sol2,Lemma 3.4]. Since every G-orbit in Ξ contains an element in positive position, we may assume that (Q, δ, t) is positive.…”
Section: B]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let the central extension R + L → R L and p ♮ L be as in the proof of Proposition 2.2, and let R + be the inverse image of R L,y,σ,ρ • in R + L . As in (4), H(G • R L,y,σ,ρ • , L, L) is the direct summand [Sol1,Theorem 1.2] or [RaRa,p. 24]) there is a bijection…”
Section: It Induces Admentioning
confidence: 99%