2019
DOI: 10.1214/18-aop1280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paracontrolled quasilinear SPDEs

Abstract: We introduce a non-linear paracontrolled calculus and use it to renormalise a class of singular SPDEs including certain quasilinear variants of the periodic two dimensional parabolic Anderson model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only disadvantage of our approach, compared to [1,5,11], is that it is not obvious at all a priori why the counterterms generated by the renormalization procedure should be local in the solution. The reason for this is that our method relies on the introduction of additional "nonphysical" components to our equation, which are given by some nonlocal, nonlinear functionals of the solution, and we cannot rule out in general that the counterterms depend on these nonphysical terms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The only disadvantage of our approach, compared to [1,5,11], is that it is not obvious at all a priori why the counterterms generated by the renormalization procedure should be local in the solution. The reason for this is that our method relies on the introduction of additional "nonphysical" components to our equation, which are given by some nonlocal, nonlinear functionals of the solution, and we cannot rule out in general that the counterterms depend on these nonphysical terms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x > 0, a is a smooth function taking values in K for some compact K .0; 1/, and F 0 and F 1 are smooth functions. The quasilinear equations considered in previous works [1,5,11] correspond to situations where > 1 3 , F 0 D 0. Let us take a compactly supported, nonnegative, symmetric (under the involution x 7 !…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These two theories allowed for the first time to study stochastic PDEs with very singular coefficients (such as the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation, see [15]) which posed long standing problems. Amongst the many papers in the area of stochastic PDEs that build on these ideas, we mention a series of recent ones on quasilinear stochastic PDEs [2,10,13,24,25] that may be of interest to the reader. Also in the present paper we consider a quasilinear PDE, but a deterministic one, where one of the coefficients is singular because it is a distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So a better understanding for more regular noises should be helpful. To deal with rough noises an alternative to regularity structures is to stay closer to a paracontrolled approach [31], which has recently been proposed for certain quasilinear SPDEs [8,27,50,51].Since the linear operator A depends on the solution itself, which will be in our case a stochastic process, we cannot apply the standard fixed-point argument as in [3,63]. Namely, if we denote with U u the random evolution operator generated by A(u), one naturally expects that the mild solution of (1.1) should be given by the variation-of-constants formula u(t) = U u (t, 0)u 0 + t 0 U u (t, s)F (s, u(s)) ds +t 0 U u (t, s)σ(s, u(s)) dW (s).(1.2)As already observed in [57], and justified in Sections 2 and 3, the random evolution operator…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%