2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06253-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paracrine cyclooxygenase-2 activity by macrophages drives colorectal adenoma progression in the Apc Min/+ mouse model of intestinal tumorigenesis

Abstract: Genetic deletion or pharmacological inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 abrogates intestinal adenoma development at early stages of colorectal carcinogenesis. COX-2 is localised to stromal cells (predominantly macrophages) in human and mouse intestinal adenomas. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that paracrine Cox-2-mediated signalling from macrophages drives adenoma growth and progression in vivo in the Apc Min/+ mouse model of intestinal tumorigenesis. Using a transgenic C57Bl/6 mouse model of Cox-2 over-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The colocalization finding indicates that COX-2 produced by the infiltrating inflammatory cells at the wound site could induce TGF Beta-1 synthesis and production by the same cells through autocrine mechanism or the nearby cells through a paracrine mechanism or both. Paracrine/autocrine signalling between COX-2 and TGF Betahas been extensively studied in several in vitro models [71] and this COX-2 and TGF Beta-1 interregulation was shown in fibroblast [72], in macrophages and intestinal epithelial lining [73,74], in bronchial epithelium [75] in lung fibroblasts [76] and in keratinocytes [77]. Paracrine/autocrine regulation between COX-2 and TGF Beta and other growth factor has been a hot area of research in oncology as this inter-regulation was proposed to play a critical role in cancer invasion and metastasis [74][75][76][77][78].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The colocalization finding indicates that COX-2 produced by the infiltrating inflammatory cells at the wound site could induce TGF Beta-1 synthesis and production by the same cells through autocrine mechanism or the nearby cells through a paracrine mechanism or both. Paracrine/autocrine signalling between COX-2 and TGF Betahas been extensively studied in several in vitro models [71] and this COX-2 and TGF Beta-1 interregulation was shown in fibroblast [72], in macrophages and intestinal epithelial lining [73,74], in bronchial epithelium [75] in lung fibroblasts [76] and in keratinocytes [77]. Paracrine/autocrine regulation between COX-2 and TGF Beta and other growth factor has been a hot area of research in oncology as this inter-regulation was proposed to play a critical role in cancer invasion and metastasis [74][75][76][77][78].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PGE 2 signalling has a direct trophic function in mouse models of colon cancer, for example, through activation of β-catenin [128]. Macrophage-derived PGE 2 also increases COX-2 expression in neoplastic cells, creating a positive feedback cycle, which greatly increases the local level of PGE 2 in the colon, driving tumourigenesis [208].…”
Section: Pge 2 As Trophic Factor and Immunomodulatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secreted by neoplastic cells and macrophages in the colon [205][206][207][208]. Directly promotes PNC proliferation [7].…”
Section: Pgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been recognized for some time that macrophages are a principal source for increased COX-2 expression in intestinal adenomas ( Hull et al, 1999 ). Moreover, the same group previously showed that overexpression of COX-2 in the myeloid compartment (using the same Lys2 Cre driver utilized here) can lead to increased intestinal tumorigenesis ( Hull et al, 2017 ). However, in other studies, conditional Ptgs2 gene deletion only resulted in reduced intestinal polyp burden when the epithelial compartment was targeted in female mice, with no effects seen in males or after myeloid cell deletion of the gene ( Cherukuri et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%