2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13287-020-01651-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paracrine effects of intraocularly implanted cells on degenerating retinas in mice

Abstract: Background: Retinal degeneration is a leading cause of blindness in the world; its etiology is complex and involves genetic defects and stress-associated aging. In addition to gene therapies for known genetically defective retinal degeneration, cellular therapies have been widely explored for restoring vision in both preclinical animal models and clinical trials. Stem cells of distinct tissue sources and their derived lineages have been tested for treating retinal degeneration; most of them were reported to be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the previous studies [33,37,52,65], RCS rats or other animal models of RD, which underwent a progressive retinal degeneration, can be halted by stem cell-based therapy. Our study confirmed the protective effect of different stem cells and hiPSC-RPE cells on RCS rats with various degrees, and figured out the most effective stem cell-based therapy for RD that is the subretinal transplantation of hiPSC-RPE cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Consistent with the previous studies [33,37,52,65], RCS rats or other animal models of RD, which underwent a progressive retinal degeneration, can be halted by stem cell-based therapy. Our study confirmed the protective effect of different stem cells and hiPSC-RPE cells on RCS rats with various degrees, and figured out the most effective stem cell-based therapy for RD that is the subretinal transplantation of hiPSC-RPE cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In the majority of the preclinical trials with dissociated cells suspensions for photoreceptor regeneration, the transplanted cells fail to survive or to functionally integrate with the host tissue; despite some positive results none of the attempted approaches achieved a significant restoration of the visual function ( Gamm and Wong, 2015 ; Canto-Soler et al, 2016 ; Zarbin, 2016 ). Furthermore, it is not known to which extent the observed improvements are due to the capability of the grafted cells of replacing the lost retinal tissue; to the secretion of protective and regenerative factors that protect the retinal neurons, or by both of them ( Liu et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This material transfer is bidirectional and, interestingly, it is independent of the source of implanted stem cells ( Singh et al, 2016 ; Ortin-Martinez et al, 2017 ; Waldron et al, 2018 ). It seems that the therapeutic effects are due more to neurotrophic and neuroprotective function, rather than functional integration in the diseased retina ( Liu et al, 2020 ). These facts raise the need to reevaluate all up-to-day photoreceptor transplant studies, characterizing the relative contribution to vision restoration based on material transfer and donor integration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stem cells from different tissue sources and their derived lineages have been tested to treat retinal degeneration. Currently, it is not known whether visual improvement by cell therapy is due to the fact that the grafted cells are capable of replacing lost retinal neurons; or due to the secretion, by these cellular implants, of neuroprotective and neurotrophic factors that protect the host retina; or both causes [110].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%