2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2278410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paradigm Shift in the Global IP Regime: The Agency of Academics

Abstract: The global intellectual property (IP) regime is in the midst of a paradigm shift in favor of greater access to protected work. Current explanations of this paradigm shift emphasize the agency of transnational advocacy networks, but ignore the role of academics. Scholars interested by global IP politics have failed to engage in reflexive thinking. Building on the results from a survey of 1,679 IP experts, this article argues that a community of academics successfully broke the policy monopoly of practitioners o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a study of counter-hegemonic resistance exceeds the scope of this article, we note that both state and non-state forces-in both developed and developing countries-resist the dynamic of legal transplantation (Morin 2014). In the past, those forces obliged the US government to change its strategy from coercion to contractualization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although a study of counter-hegemonic resistance exceeds the scope of this article, we note that both state and non-state forces-in both developed and developing countries-resist the dynamic of legal transplantation (Morin 2014). In the past, those forces obliged the US government to change its strategy from coercion to contractualization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Even the Chinese government opposed ACTA officially at the TRIPS Council; domestic IP experts took an open and embracing attitude towards the ACTA and TPP (Figure ). The open and embracing attitude among the IP epistemic communities can be explained by Morin's viewpoint that IP epistemic communities actively collaborate with other transnational networks and promote a paradigm change (Morin, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier studies in the field of development assistance related to IP policy suggest that a wide range of views exist with respect to the appropriate level of IP protection in a country, and that capacity building and technical assistance by IGOs and foreign universities seem to have, relative to other providers of such technical assistance, an impact on the extent to which the recipient believes the country should have stronger IP protection or greater access, and policy flexibility in this area (Morin, 2013;2014). …”
Section: Existing Research and Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%