2017
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.16.17130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paradigm Shifts in Breast Care Delivery: Impact of Imaging in a Multidisciplinary Environment

Abstract: The practice of breast imaging in a collaborative multidisciplinary environment adds significant value to outcomes in women’s healthcare. In this article, we describe multidisciplinary considerations in breast cancer screening and early detection, the impact of imaging and histopathologic findings in the diagnostic evaluation and management of breast abnormalities, and the contribution of imaging to surgical and radiation therapy planning for the breast cancer patient.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 For example, a pathological diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia in a small lesion that was nearly entirely removed by vacuum-assisted biopsy may not require subsequent surgical resection. 15 On the other hand, if the same pathological diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia was obtained with imaging showing extensive suspicious findings, there was a high possibility of co-existing higher-grade lesions and further surgical excision would be justified. Therefore, a single-standard approach does not exist for high-risk breast lesions and individualised management should be offered.…”
Section: Imaging Findings In Patients With Postproceduralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 For example, a pathological diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia in a small lesion that was nearly entirely removed by vacuum-assisted biopsy may not require subsequent surgical resection. 15 On the other hand, if the same pathological diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia was obtained with imaging showing extensive suspicious findings, there was a high possibility of co-existing higher-grade lesions and further surgical excision would be justified. Therefore, a single-standard approach does not exist for high-risk breast lesions and individualised management should be offered.…”
Section: Imaging Findings In Patients With Postproceduralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trend to de-escalate treatment with complete removal of the lesion by VAB has been expanding to other histological diagnosis with uncertain malignant potential and may be appropriate for selected cases of flat epithelial atypia, classic lobular neoplasia, radial scar, and benign phyllodes tumor [15,16].…”
Section: Therapeutic Vabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thorough review and discussion of clinical and imaging findings, biopsy characteristics including the biopsy method and degree of removal, pathological findings including the extent of the lesion, and associations between clinical and pathological features and imaging can lead to personalized management recommendations [ 64 , 66 ]. For example, a diagnosis of focal ADH on pathology in a small lesion that has been nearly completely removed by vacuum-assisted biopsy may result in a recommendation of imaging follow-up [ 66 ]. In contrast, a finding of extensive high-risk disease in a lesion with limited sampling has a higher possibility of co-existing higher-grade lesions, and surgical excision may be recommended.…”
Section: Categories Of Imaging-pathology Concordancementioning
confidence: 99%