2013
DOI: 10.1134/s106377611312011x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paradox of a nonlinear beam splitter and its resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effective thickness of the active region is about 0.1 μm, i.e., the realized configuration is characteristic for nanophotonics. Adequate theoretical analysis confirms the results of the performed polarization-optical nanodiagnostics of the considered nonlinear beam splitter [13,14].…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…The effective thickness of the active region is about 0.1 μm, i.e., the realized configuration is characteristic for nanophotonics. Adequate theoretical analysis confirms the results of the performed polarization-optical nanodiagnostics of the considered nonlinear beam splitter [13,14].…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…To ensure that these noises do not affect the results of observations, polarization responses must be strong in according to both criteria: Δ >> ΔSNL and Δ >> ΔTNL. In accordance with these criteria, the region Δ << ΔSNL may naturally be called the region of superweak (or superlow) signals -SWS [3][4][5][6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%