2012
DOI: 10.1021/la3016589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paradox of Stability of Nanoparticles at Very Low Ionic Strength

Abstract: The scaling of electrical double layer interaction energy from a plate-plate system to a sphere-plate system was reexamined, and it was found that accurate scaling without resorting to the Derjaguin approximation theoretically predicts the destabilization of nanoparticles in water depleted of added electrolyte and, consequentially, a maximum stability at a moderate ionic strength. This theoretical feature re-emphasizes the dual-role nature of added electrolyte that was supported by experimental results of dire… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 presents calculated interaction energy profiles for the 20‐nm silica NP interacting with sand or biochar surface in NaCl and CaCl 2 solutions with different ISs. Although it is commonly reported that the interaction energy barrier decreases monotonically with increasing IS (Adamczyk and Weronski, 1999; Gregory, 1975; Hahn and O'Melia, 2004; Hahn et al, 2004; Ryan and Elimelech, 1996; Tosco et al, 2009), our calculations showed nonmonotonic variation of energy barrier with IS, similar to the theoretical results in Lin and Wiesner (2012). These theoretical calculations, however, deviate from the experimental result (i.e., monotonic increase of attachment with IS) reported in our study and in the literature (Bayat et al, 2015; Hahn and O'Melia, 2004; Hahn et al, 2004; Molnar et al, 2015; Yin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 6 presents calculated interaction energy profiles for the 20‐nm silica NP interacting with sand or biochar surface in NaCl and CaCl 2 solutions with different ISs. Although it is commonly reported that the interaction energy barrier decreases monotonically with increasing IS (Adamczyk and Weronski, 1999; Gregory, 1975; Hahn and O'Melia, 2004; Hahn et al, 2004; Ryan and Elimelech, 1996; Tosco et al, 2009), our calculations showed nonmonotonic variation of energy barrier with IS, similar to the theoretical results in Lin and Wiesner (2012). These theoretical calculations, however, deviate from the experimental result (i.e., monotonic increase of attachment with IS) reported in our study and in the literature (Bayat et al, 2015; Hahn and O'Melia, 2004; Hahn et al, 2004; Molnar et al, 2015; Yin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…These theoretical calculations, however, deviate from the experimental result (i.e., monotonic increase of attachment with IS) reported in our study and in the literature (Bayat et al, 2015; Hahn and O'Melia, 2004; Hahn et al, 2004; Molnar et al, 2015; Yin et al, 2014). Lin and Wiesner (2012) demonstrated that the discrepancy is likely the reason that the equilibrium condition assumed in formulating the Possion–Boltzmann equation in the DLVO approach cannot be satisfied with fast moving NPs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the theoretical calculations cannot explain the experimental observations. Lin and Wiesner (2012) obtained similar results for spherical nanoparticles by using the SEI technique to adequately evaluate the interaction energies. Conversely, if the Derjaguin approximation approach is used for the calculations, increasing IS will cause a decrease in the repulsive energy barrier (Hahn and O'Melia, 2004; Hahn et al, 2004; Shen et al, 2007, 2017; Torkzaban and Bradford, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One major problem is that the EDL interaction, which comprises both osmotic and Coulombic contributions [70,75], should theoretically have negligible impact on the overall interaction due to the very short Debye length (calculated to be $ 0.4 nm for the feed solution used). Within such a short Debye length, the vdW force should dominate the overall interaction and eclipse any difference in the EDL interaction.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Electrostatic Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%