2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paradoxes or theoretical failures? The jury is still out

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should also be noted that there is reason to question whether the paradox of enrichment is truly a predication that needs explanation or is instead simply a theoretical failure-a result, perhaps, of the assumption that predator-prey relationships are preydependent rather than predator-dependent (under extreme predator dependence, paradox of enrichment-type effects are absent) [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should also be noted that there is reason to question whether the paradox of enrichment is truly a predication that needs explanation or is instead simply a theoretical failure-a result, perhaps, of the assumption that predator-prey relationships are preydependent rather than predator-dependent (under extreme predator dependence, paradox of enrichment-type effects are absent) [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several field studies have suggested that the paradox of enrichment does not exist in natural food webs (e.g., McCauley and Murdoch 1990). Thus, the paradox of enrichment is an unsolved problem among community ecology issues, and theoretical studies continue to attempt to resolve the paradox or explain the lack of the paradox in nature (Jensen and Ginzburg 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resolution of this paradoxical prediction is a challenging theoretical problem in ecology. Many theoretical studies have proposed ways in which the paradox might be resolved theoretically (reviewed in Jensen & Ginzburg 2005). Although they capture the important aspects of the natural world, most of these studies assume fixed predator-prey interaction links (Gilpin 1975;Arditi & Ginzburg 1989;Kretzschmar et al 1993;Abrams & Walters 1996;Arditi et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%