2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paradoxical extension into the contralesional hemispace in spatial neglect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limited extent of the skin could serve as boundary, potentially provoking a rebound or cessation of the motion. Similarly, for visual stimuli it has been shown that a forward displacement decreased or even reversed when a target stimulus was approaching a boundary with the backward displacement increasing as a function of distance from said boundary (Hubbard & Motes, 2005), dubbed "framing effect" in Lenggenhager et al (2012Lenggenhager et al ( , p. 1325. Thus, it is possible that the wrist and the elbow are perceived as boundaries at which the movement direction would be reversed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The limited extent of the skin could serve as boundary, potentially provoking a rebound or cessation of the motion. Similarly, for visual stimuli it has been shown that a forward displacement decreased or even reversed when a target stimulus was approaching a boundary with the backward displacement increasing as a function of distance from said boundary (Hubbard & Motes, 2005), dubbed "framing effect" in Lenggenhager et al (2012Lenggenhager et al ( , p. 1325. Thus, it is possible that the wrist and the elbow are perceived as boundaries at which the movement direction would be reversed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially in the field investigating non-veridical perceptions, crossmodal comparisons may be helpful to uncover underlying mechanisms (Christopher Bill & Teft, 1972;Helson, 1930;Sarrazin, Giraudo, & Pittenger, 2005). Evidence of a tactile RM would allow to disentangle body-centered and space-centered frames of references, which is relevant for patients with spatial processing deficits, in whom RM has previously been shown to be altered (Lenggenhager et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This disproportionate leftward extension may reflect a distorted representation of extra-personal space, or of the “spatial medium” [discussion in Vallar (2009)]. Paradoxical disproportionate leftward extensions by right-brain-damaged patients with left spatial neglect in variants of the line bisection task have been repeatedly reported [Bisiach et al (1994) setting the endpoints of a line, given its midpoint; Gallace et al (2008), for related evidence; see also converging findings evidence in Lenggenhager et al (2012), using moving stimuli]. In these studies, disproportionate leftward extensions, however, were found in patients with left neglect, and with different tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this view, damage, malfunctioning or altered feedback from and toward the body matrix may be involved in the etiology of different clinical conditions (Riva, 2016a), from neurological disorders like neglect (Lenggenhager et al, 2012; Bolognini et al, 2016) and chronic pain (Tsay et al, 2015; Di Lernia et al, 2016b) to psychiatric disorders like schizophrenia (Ferri et al, 2014; Postmes et al, 2014), depression (Wheatley et al, 2007; Barrett et al, 2016), depersonalization/derealization disorder (Simeon et al, 2000; Jáuregui Renaud, 2015) and eating disorders (Riva et al, 2013; Riva, 2014, 2016b; Dakanalis et al, 2016; Serino et al, 2016a). …”
Section: The Body Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%