2022
DOI: 10.1111/tid.13964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paradoxical outcomes of gram‐negative bloodstream infection in solid organ transplant recipients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 35 Not coincidentally, it has been reported that those who had sepsis and septic shock with an immunocompromised status did not have a higher mortality rate than non-immunocompromised patients. 36 Battle and Al-Hasan 37 thought that immunocompromised patients would more easily capture the clinicians’ attention and receive aggressive empirical antimicrobial treatments, which could be a plausible explanation for this phenomenon. This paradox may also be related to immunosuppression, which could inhibit the development of the sepsis cascade by lowering the pro-inflammatory chemokine and cytokine responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 35 Not coincidentally, it has been reported that those who had sepsis and septic shock with an immunocompromised status did not have a higher mortality rate than non-immunocompromised patients. 36 Battle and Al-Hasan 37 thought that immunocompromised patients would more easily capture the clinicians’ attention and receive aggressive empirical antimicrobial treatments, which could be a plausible explanation for this phenomenon. This paradox may also be related to immunosuppression, which could inhibit the development of the sepsis cascade by lowering the pro-inflammatory chemokine and cytokine responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%