Paradoxical tensions and corporate sustainability: A focus on circular economy business cases

Abstract

The paradoxical tensions in corporate sustainability is hotly debated in the literature. Some authors have underlined the need for empirical works in this field, and the circular economy could help to bridge this gap. The circular economy creates contrasting challenges for companies, which lead to paradoxical tensions. On the one hand, companies pursue circular economy goals-such as the use of recycled raw materials-thus highlighting their environmental commitment. On the other hand, such usage may affect the quality and consequently the competitiveness of products. Our study investigates the acknowledgement of these tensions and the strategies adopted by companies to manage them. Using a multiple case study approach, we focus on an Italian sample of three manufacturing sectors: paper production, textile/clothing, and leather. The results show the different defensive and proactive strategies adopted by firms highlighting, in one case, a relevant opportunity exploited by a company considered in the sample. Our paper contributes to the existing knowledge on paradoxical tensions management in companies involved in corporate sustainability inviting scholars towards new research avenues focused on circular economy. KEYWORDS industrial symbiosis, paper industrial cluster, paradox theory, recycling, tannery industrial cluster

How fashion can achieve sustainable development through a circular economy and stakeholder engagement: A systematic literature review

“…• Closing resource loops: this cluster includes CF practices implemented with an aim to keep materials in the economy, Closed-loop recycling, a process where unwanted resources and products are collected, recycled, and then used again to make the same product it came from, and thus to create a circular flow of resources • Recycling for manufacturing a same product type (e.g., recycling polyester fabrics to polyester yarn for the same fashion item production) 42 (44.7%) Al Faruque et al, 2019;Bloomfield & Borstrock, 2018;Bocken et al, 2017;Bukhari et al, 2018;Cattermole, 2018;Corvellec & Stål, 2019;Daddi et al, 2019;do Amaral et al, 2018;Earley, 2017;Earley, 2019;Fischer & Pascucci, 2017;Franco, 2017;Goldsworthy & Ellams, 2019;Haslinger et al, 2019;Holtström et al, 2019;Hu et al, 2018;Hussain, 2018;Hvass & Pedersen, 2019;Karell & Niinimäki, 2019;Koszewska, 2018;Leal Filho et al, 2019;Määttänen et al, 2019;…”

“…In "internal barriers," only one cluster management barrier (14, 12.8%) was identified. In the management barriers cluster, lack of transparency for managing material circularity, management's decisions that prioritize profit growth over sustainability, management's lack of power to influence other fashion stakeholders to participate in their CF missions, and the decentralization of fashion designers in Bloomfield & Borstrock, 2018;Bocken et al, 2017;Bukhari et al, 2018;Cattermole, 2018;Daddi et al, 2019;do Amaral et al, 2018;Franco, 2017;Holtström et al, 2019;Hussain, 2018;Karell & Niinimäki, 2019;Kjaer et al, 2019;Koszewska, 2018;Leal Filho et al, 2019;Norris, 2019b;Pal et al, 2019;Peirson-Smith & Evans, 2017;Piribauer & Bartl, 2019;Popescu, 2018;Sandvik & Stubbs, 2019;Singh et al, 2019;Smith et al, 2017;Valentine et al, 2017;Weber...…”

Microfoundations of dynamic capabilities: Insights from circular economy business cases

“…In this regard, the role of top management was again quite pivotal because such decisions usually involve high risks. It is noteworthy that top management may encounter paradoxical tensions in CE decisions (Daddi, Ceglia, Bianchi, & de Barcellos, ). In fact, in Beta, initially, no one (top management members) was willing to pursue CE except the CEO (an environmentally conscious leader).…”

Corporate images and customer behavioral intentions in an environmentally certified context: Promoting environmental sustainability in the hospitality industry

“…With the object of reducing environmental degradation and involving consumers that are conscious about green issues, numerous companies are implementing environmental certification programs (Lee, Noh, Choi, & Rha, ). Environmental certifications attempt to promote companies' environmental commitment and differentiating genuine environmentally friendly companies from “green‐washed” businesses (Daddi, Ceglia, Bianchi, & Dutra de Barcellos, ). “Greenwashing” is defined as “the act of misleading consumers regarding the environmental practices of a company or the environmental benefits of a product or service” (TerraChoice, , p. 1).…”