1983
DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1983.04210070017006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paraldehyde Therapy in Childhood Status Epilepticus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Up until this current study, there had been only one report on the use of rectal paraldehyde in treating status epilepticus in children 8. In this report, of the 13 children (all with non-specified seizure types) who received paraldehyde in 16 separate episodes, only four received the drug rectally and in one of these the rectal dose was followed by an intravenous dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Up until this current study, there had been only one report on the use of rectal paraldehyde in treating status epilepticus in children 8. In this report, of the 13 children (all with non-specified seizure types) who received paraldehyde in 16 separate episodes, only four received the drug rectally and in one of these the rectal dose was followed by an intravenous dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Arachis oil should now be avoided because of the theoretical risk of peanut allergy. There are limited published data on the use of rectal paraldehyde6 23; however, a large amount of clinical experience in children supports its effectiveness. At the time of writing, paraldehyde for rectal administration is difficult to obtain.…”
Section: Methods and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, some case series report its benefit in a minority of cases where other AEDs have failed. In one case series where paraldehyde was given after phenytoin and phenobarbitone had been unsuccessful, it was found to be effective in six of 16 patients who received a mixture of intravenous and rectal preparations 53. There have been a number of reports of serious adverse side effects from intravenous and intramuscular use54 55 such that only the rectal route is recommended in the UK.…”
Section: Second Line Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%