1994
DOI: 10.1109/26.285151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel acquisition of PN sequences in DS/SS systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exiting strategies for code acquisition are single and multiple dwell detectors [1], matched filters [2], sequential [3] and parallel detection [4]. Because of the frequency uncertainty, the most common approach is to sequentially search all code phases over the range of Doppler frequency offsets, which may lead to a large of acquisition time since it needs to search all time and frequency units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exiting strategies for code acquisition are single and multiple dwell detectors [1], matched filters [2], sequential [3] and parallel detection [4]. Because of the frequency uncertainty, the most common approach is to sequentially search all code phases over the range of Doppler frequency offsets, which may lead to a large of acquisition time since it needs to search all time and frequency units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the receiver has no knowledge about the transmitter's PN sequence (e.g., when intercepting an unfriendly transmission), all the related issues of synchronization, multipath equalization, and data detection become more challenging. Much of the literature has focused on the problem of synchronization or "code-delay acquisition" under various interferences and multipath environments when the PN sequence is known to the receiver [3]. However, the literature is not equally rich when the PN sequence is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jo= 10loglo WJ -TL (10) where TL is the free-space transmission loss given by [10]: TL = 201og10 4,1 (11) For the carrier frequency f in GHz and R in miles, equation (1 1) becomes: TL = 96.6 + 20 log1o f + 20 loglo (R) (12) Jamming to signal power ratio for a remote source operating in L-band at range R miles emitting effective WJ watts may be written as [10]:…”
Section: Performance In the Presence Of Intentional Jammingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a parallel acquisition mode, the detection stage simultaneously evaluates all the possible code offsets and picks the one with the highest correlation [11,12].…”
Section: Parallel Search Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%