1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf02023050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel bundle-based decomposition for large-scale structured mathematical programming problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Medhi [ 16] developed a bundle-based distributed decomposition algorithm for convex optimization problems, and demonstrated its effectiveness on block-angular linear programs as a special class of convex programs. Likewise, Ho et al [11] implemented Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition [3] on the CRYSTAL multicomputer [4], and showed that multiprocessing can be potentially useful for solving large-scale structured linear programs.…”
Section: Parallel and Distributed Optimization Of Linear Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Medhi [ 16] developed a bundle-based distributed decomposition algorithm for convex optimization problems, and demonstrated its effectiveness on block-angular linear programs as a special class of convex programs. Likewise, Ho et al [11] implemented Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition [3] on the CRYSTAL multicomputer [4], and showed that multiprocessing can be potentially useful for solving large-scale structured linear programs.…”
Section: Parallel and Distributed Optimization Of Linear Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of such independent blocks, that could be comfortably addressed, is increasing due to the incorporation of more and more processors into such computers. While the asynchronous, multiprocessing capability of MIMD computers has been successfully exploited to solve certain classes of structured linear programs (LP's) [9,11,16], its effectiveness with unstructured LP's has not been fully studied. In this paper, we take up this topic by considering the adaptation of MIMD computers to solve general linear programs in the form:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the relaxed constraints. Lagrangean-based approaches such as the Dantzig-Wolfe method (Ho et al 1988, Gnanendran andHo 1993) or the bundle method (Medhi 1990, Ferris and Horn 1998, Frangioni and Gallo 1999 directly approach the maximization of the nondifferentiable Lagrangean function, whose calculation breaks down in the solution of an independent subproblem for each block. Other methods are based on differentiable but non-separable functions, such as the augmented Lagrangean (De Leone et al 1994, Kontogiorgis et al 1996, linear-quadratic (Pinar and Zenios 1992) or exponential (Grigoriadis and Khachiyan 1995) penalty functions, or logarithmic barrier functions Schultz 1992, De Leone et al 1994).…”
Section: Mmcf: Formulation and Parallel Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches based on complex coordinators are the Dantzig-Wolfe method (Ho et al 1988, Gnanendran andHo 1993) and bundle methods (Medhi 1990, De Leone et al 1993, Ferris and Horn 1998, Frangioni and Gallo 1999. At each step, the master uses (potentially all) the information collected from all the previous slave phases-columns or subgradients, depending on the viewpoint-to compute the new vector of prices to be broadcasted to the slaves.…”
Section: Mmcf: Formulation and Parallel Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation