2020
DOI: 10.1177/0954409720908497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel co-simulation of locomotive wheel wear and rolling contact fatigue in a heavy haul train operational environment

Abstract: Locomotive wheel wear and rolling contact fatigue simulations that consider both train dynamics and detailed traction control systems have not been reported. This paper developed a parallel co-simulation method to link an in-house longitudinal train dynamics simulator to a commercial software package named GENSYS. An advanced longitudinal train dynamics model, a traction control system model and a wheel–rail contact model were then incorporated into the simulation. Three wear calculation models (T-gamma model,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stage 3 should be realised on the virtual simulation platform that is commonly built on a High-Performance Computing (HPC) cluster. The digital twin model uses parallel computing and co-simulation technique between longitudinal train dynamics, vehicle dynamics and track dynamics (where a track model is implemented as a separate model) software packages [13,[22][23][24][25]. The process commonly uses one independent processor core on the HPC to simulate each vehicle (implemented in a multibody software package) in the train as it travels over the whole railway route.…”
Section: Design Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stage 3 should be realised on the virtual simulation platform that is commonly built on a High-Performance Computing (HPC) cluster. The digital twin model uses parallel computing and co-simulation technique between longitudinal train dynamics, vehicle dynamics and track dynamics (where a track model is implemented as a separate model) software packages [13,[22][23][24][25]. The process commonly uses one independent processor core on the HPC to simulate each vehicle (implemented in a multibody software package) in the train as it travels over the whole railway route.…”
Section: Design Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such wear is influenced by several mechanisms, for instance, presence of friction modifier/enhancer, fluctuating high contact pressure on a varying small contact patch due to different vehicle running conditions, various rolling/sliding speed, etc. Specifically, in the railway industry and academia, there are three widely accepted methods for estimating wheel and rail wear rates [4]: the T-gamma model [5,6], the Archard model developed by British Rail Research [7,8], and the USFD model from the University of Sheffield [9][10][11]. The T-gamma approach uses the wheel-rail contact pressure and sliding velocity to determine the energy dissipation from the wheel-rail contact and can be formulated as the T γ value [12]:…”
Section: Wear and Rcf Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An upgrade was then proposed allowing to co-simulate the LTD and the dynamics of two locomotives, with the new model also relying on parallelization to reduce the computational times, implementing the strategy sketched in Fig. 5b [55]. The upgraded model focused on the locomotive wheel wear and estimated the damages due to RCF.…”
Section: Models Performing a Single Dynamic Simulation And A Single W...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig 5. Models performing a single dynamic simulation: a model by Central Queensland researchers without co-simulation (redrawn from[54]); b model by Central Queensland researchers with co-simulation and parallel computing techniques (redrawn from[55]); c model by Zhang et al[58] with co-simulation between Simpack MB model and Simulink wear computation model…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%