Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2009
DOI: 10.1145/1557019.1557127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel community detection on large networks with propinquity dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang 15 [Zhang et al 2009] proposed an iterative process that reinforces the network topology and propinquity that is interpreted as the probability of a pair of nodes belonging to the same community. The propinquity between two vertices is defined as the sum of the number of direct links, number of common neighbors and the number of links within the common neighborhood.…”
Section: Congamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang 15 [Zhang et al 2009] proposed an iterative process that reinforces the network topology and propinquity that is interpreted as the probability of a pair of nodes belonging to the same community. The propinquity between two vertices is defined as the sum of the number of direct links, number of common neighbors and the number of links within the common neighborhood.…”
Section: Congamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A parallel clustering algorithm is suggested in [8], which is a parallelized version of DBSCAN [9]. In [10], the authors coded their community detection algorithm based on propinquity using a vertexoriented Bulk Synchronous Parallel (BSP) model to enable large scale parallelization. In [11], the authors implemented community detection algorithm on massively multithreaded Cray XMT and ran on it networks with over 100 million nodes and over a billion edges.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic formulation of the community detection task expects as an output a partitioning of a network; that is, each node is a member of exactly one community. Numerous variants of the problem have been studied, including detection of overlapping communities where a vertex can belong to multiple communities (e.g., works by Gregory [9] and Zhang et al [22]), clustering of bipartite graphs (e.g., Papadimitriou et al [18]), and detection of clusters exploiting additional information in addition to network structure (e.g., attributes on nodes/edges, Yang et al [21]). …”
Section: Community Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%