2018
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2018.028688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel-Forms Reliability and Clinical Utility of an Application Version of the Activity Card Sort Australia (18–64)

Abstract: Objective: This study examined the parallel forms reliability of a web application version (app) of the Activity Card Sort Australia for adults aged 18-64 and assessed clinical utility. Methods: Forty eight participants completed the app and card versions of the tool within a 2to 3-week interval and provided feedback via a purpose-designed survey. Intra-class correlation analysis tested parallel forms reliability. Results: The app demonstrated acceptable parallel forms reliability for the overall retained acti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of photos evoked memories of meaningful occupations, the identification of barriers to engagement, and possible engagement in occupations that have not been thought about for a while (Johnson, 2013). Furthermore, the physical tangibleness of sorting the cards prompted a “think-aloud” protocol where participants explained their reasoning and decision-making processes around placing a card in a particular category (Conrad & Tucker, 2019; Gustafsson et al, 2018). The cards evoked responses that supported participants to identify gaps and possibilities for the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of photos evoked memories of meaningful occupations, the identification of barriers to engagement, and possible engagement in occupations that have not been thought about for a while (Johnson, 2013). Furthermore, the physical tangibleness of sorting the cards prompted a “think-aloud” protocol where participants explained their reasoning and decision-making processes around placing a card in a particular category (Conrad & Tucker, 2019; Gustafsson et al, 2018). The cards evoked responses that supported participants to identify gaps and possibilities for the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Israeli Chinese HK English Spanish Arabic Puerto Rican Spanish Dutch Australia Doney et al 19 Tse,T et al 9 Gustafsson et al 29 Gustafsson et al 30 ACS-Aus ACS-Aus ACS-Aus ACS-App Lebanon Lyons et al 25 m-ACS Netherland Jong et al 26 Poerbodipoero et al 22 Leenders et al 31…”
Section: Language -Versionmentioning
confidence: 99%