2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel Godunov smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) with improved treatment of Boundary Conditions and an application to granular flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our current model, the ground is assumed to be flat. For more complicated topography, it has been shown in other work (Kumar et al, 2013) that this method works as well. We do have concern regarding potential limitation of this method of deployment of ghost particles for more complicated boundaries in three dimensions.…”
Section: Wall Boundary Conditionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our current model, the ground is assumed to be flat. For more complicated topography, it has been shown in other work (Kumar et al, 2013) that this method works as well. We do have concern regarding potential limitation of this method of deployment of ghost particles for more complicated boundaries in three dimensions.…”
Section: Wall Boundary Conditionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In addition, a natural way of imposing the eruption boundary condition is using eruption ghost particles. To impose boundary conditions in a consistent way, we adopt a modified version of the ghost particle method (Kumar et al, 2013) for wall boundary conditions. Stationary wall ghost particles are deployed in the same way as real particles.…”
Section: Wall Boundary Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These wall ghost particles serve as neighbors in momentum and energy update. More implementation details about this method can 20 be found in (Kumar et al, 2013). As these wall ghost particles are stationary, there is no mass flux on the boundary (Eq.…”
Section: Wall Boundary Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a natural way of imposing eruption boundary condition is using eruption ghost particles. To impose boundary conditions in a consistent way, we adopt a modified version of the ghost particle method (Kumar et al, 2013) for wall boundary conditions. Stationary wall ghost particles are deployed in the same way as real particles.…”
Section: Wall Boundary Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%