2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel hash function construction based on coupled map lattices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absolute difference of two hash values and the theoretical number of ω with different values during N independent experiments which is denoted by W N (ω) is calculated using the following formulas: Figure 4a,b. It seems that the proposed algorithm possesses a stronger collision resistance capability than the algorithms in [12,14,27,44] and can be compared with [45,46]. …”
Section: Collision Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The absolute difference of two hash values and the theoretical number of ω with different values during N independent experiments which is denoted by W N (ω) is calculated using the following formulas: Figure 4a,b. It seems that the proposed algorithm possesses a stronger collision resistance capability than the algorithms in [12,14,27,44] and can be compared with [45,46]. …”
Section: Collision Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main goal of this attack is to find two messages with identical hash values with less than 2 n/2 trials (n is the size of hash value) [46,51,55]. In fact, the algorithm is flexible so that the length of the hash value can be tuned.…”
Section: Resistance To Birthday Attackmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This procedure is repeated 10000 times. Table 6 depicts the minimum, maximum and mean values of d. It can be seen that the average absolute difference of each character of the proposed hashing scheme is close to the ideal value of 85.43 [20]. This means that the proposed hashing scheme has the stronger collision resistance than the well-known approaches such as MD5 and SHA-1, and the other chaos-based approaches in [17,18,19,21,22].…”
Section: Collision Analysis 1) Collision Testmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The authors claimed that the algorithm structure ensured the uniform sensitivity of the hash value to the message blocks at different positions. Although this claim has been disputed later on by several researchers, but their basic model has found validation in some other popular schemes [38].…”
Section: Additional Forms Of Neural Cryptographymentioning
confidence: 99%