2014
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1403.5805
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel Implementations of the Jacobi Linear Algebraic Systems Solve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 2 (Low Data Rate) Suppose A1, A2, and A3 hold, with F d and M (α, h) as defined in (9) and (10). Then the following hold.…”
Section: Convergence Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Theorem 2 (Low Data Rate) Suppose A1, A2, and A3 hold, with F d and M (α, h) as defined in (9) and (10). Then the following hold.…”
Section: Convergence Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 2 Theorem 1 shows that by using a scaling function decaying exponentially and a uniform quantizer, Algorithm 1 can ensure asymptotic convergence to the unique solution. It is worth pointing out that for any given α, h, the obtained quantization level K(α, h) is conservative, while (10) gives us some intuition on the relationship between the number of bits required and the control gains and the scaling factor. In addition, Theorem 1 gives an estimate of the rate of convergence: the smaller the scaling factor α, the faster the convergence rate from (13) but more bits have to be communicated by (10), and, if α → ρ h , the required number of bits goes to infinity.…”
Section: Convergence Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations