Parallel Litigation and Foreign Investment Dispute Settlement

Cuniberti, Gilles

doi:10.1093/icsidreview/21.2.381

Cited by 11 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It is vital to distinguish between an arbitral tribunal and a national court and between two arbitral tribunals in the context of Parallelism. (Cuniberti, 2006) It has been established that "a valid arbitration agreement gives the arbitral tribunal exclusive competence to hear the case, eliminating the jurisdiction of the national court." (Cuniberti, 2006) There is a presumption that two competent forums exist, and arbitration agreement plays a vital role in making arbitral tribunal the most superior forum.…”

Section: Lis Pendens a Mean To Handle Parallelismmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(Cuniberti, 2006) It has been established that "a valid arbitration agreement gives the arbitral tribunal exclusive competence to hear the case, eliminating the jurisdiction of the national court." (Cuniberti, 2006) There is a presumption that two competent forums exist, and arbitration agreement plays a vital role in making arbitral tribunal the most superior forum. Despite its "general inapplicability," scholars argue that doctrine has been applied in specific contexts in international arbitration.…”

Section: Lis Pendens a Mean To Handle Parallelismmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The most classic example of its applicability in those cases where a party makes a jurisdictional objection challenges the arbitration agreement's validity, applicability, and existence. There is more than one competent forum In these cases for hearing jurisdictional challenges (Cuniberti, 2006).…”

Section: Lis Pendens a Mean To Handle Parallelismmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Admissibility of Lis Pendens in International Commercial Arbitration: A Comparative Insight of Different Legal Systems

Wu¹,

Jillani²

2020

JPL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An attempt has been made to investigate the role of the doctrine of Lis Pendens in international commercial arbitration while making a comparison of civil and common law traditions. Arbitration is regarded to be less painful and an effective means for resolving any type of commercial disputes. Sources of the law to investigate Arbitration's regulation on a national, institutional, and international level. However, it is known that the lis pendens doctrine has been rarely codified; thus, scholarly writings and case laws were consulted by the research for determining its adoption and content. It is important to note that the lis pendens is initially regarded as a tool, which has been developed to manage the proceedings of parallel court on a domestic level. The study concludes while arguing that when it comes to civil law tradition, lis pendens is regarded as an independent doctrine in international commercial arbitration since it shares the same claim of being tried in various forums simultaneously. In contrast, lis alibi pendens in the jurisdiction of common law is not known as a doctrine, but it is viewed as one of many factors whole applying the forum non-convenience principle. Both civil and common law need identity between various parties and their claims to constitute lis pendens in two proceedings, and therefore, they have a conform and deep understanding of the concept.

show abstract

Section: Lis Pendens a Mean To Handle Parallelismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Lis Pendens a Mean To Handle Parallelismmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Admissibility of Lis Pendens in International Commercial Arbitration: A Comparative Insight of Different Legal Systems

Wu¹,

Jillani²

2020

JPL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Εφόσον επιβεβαιωθεί η ύπαρξη εκκρεµοδικίας, οι ως άνω δικονοµικοί κανόνες δίνουν απόλυτη προτεραιότητα στη θεµελίωση της αρµοδιότητας του δικαστηρίου, στο οποίο υποβλήθηκε πρώτα η διαφορά 1323 . Αντίθετα, κατά τη συναφή αρχή forum non conveniens του αγγλοσαξονικού δικαίου, το δεύτερο δικαστήριο, στο οποίο υποβάλλεται η ήδη εκκρεµής υπόθεση, έχει τη διακριτική ευχέρεια να κρίνει ποιο από τα δύο δικαστήρια είναι το καταλληλότερο να επιληφθεί της διαφοράς, εκτιµώντας κυρίως το τί εξυπηρετεί καλύτερα τη διαδικασία, µεταξύ άλλων και από πλευράς δικαστικών εξόδων 1324 .…”

Section: η συνάφεια των αρχών Lis Pendens και Res Judicataunclassified

Η Πολλαπλότητα Των Τρόπων Επίλυσης Των Διαφορών Μεταξύ Κρατών Και Ξένων Επενδυτών

Κουτογλίδου¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Χαρακτηριστικά αναφέρεται ότι, σε αντίθεση µε άλλες διεθνείς συναλλαγές (εµπορικές, χρηµατοοικονοµικές), η διεθνής επενδυτική συναλλαγή παρεισφρέει (στο κράτος υποδοχής), καθώς ο επενδυτής διεισδύει στο κράτος, οργανώνει µονάδες παραγωγής ή άλλου είδους εγκαταστάσεις και τις λειτουργεί εντός αυτού.

show abstract

Forum Shopping and Human Rights: Staring at the Empty Shelves

Akhavan¹

2019

Human Rights Norms in ‘Other' International Courts

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Parallel Litigation and Foreign Investment Dispute Settlement

Cited by 11 publications

References 0 publications

Admissibility of Lis Pendens in International Commercial Arbitration: A Comparative Insight of Different Legal Systems

Admissibility of Lis Pendens in International Commercial Arbitration: A Comparative Insight of Different Legal Systems

Η Πολλαπλότητα Των Τρόπων Επίλυσης Των Διαφορών Μεταξύ Κρατών Και Ξένων Επενδυτών

Forum Shopping and Human Rights: Staring at the Empty Shelves

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About