2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9991(03)00194-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel multigrid smoothing: polynomial versus Gauss–Seidel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
191
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
191
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is convenient (and efficient) to adapt Chebyshev polynomial preconditioners to become multigrid smoothers [2]. Sparse approximate inverses have been proposed as parallel smoothers [14].…”
Section: Definition Of Matrix-free Smoothersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is convenient (and efficient) to adapt Chebyshev polynomial preconditioners to become multigrid smoothers [2]. Sparse approximate inverses have been proposed as parallel smoothers [14].…”
Section: Definition Of Matrix-free Smoothersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper end of this interval is obtained by a few (here 10) steps of the Lanczos algorithm together with a security margin [2]. The lower end is simply set to a fixed fraction of the upper bound.…”
Section: Definition Of Matrix-free Smoothersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if one applies this approach to Gauß-Seidel, Q k are lower triangular matrices (we call this particular smoother hybrid Gauß-Seidel; it has also been referred to as Processor Block Gauß-Seidel [5]). While this approach is easy to implement, it has the disadvantage of being more similar to a block Jacobi method, albeit worse, since the block systems are not solved exactly.…”
Section: Hybrid Gauß-seidel With Relaxation Weightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is often sufficient to take the smallest eigenvalue as a fraction of the largest eigenvalue. Experience has shown that this fraction can be chosen to be the coarsening rate (the ratio of the number of coarse grid unknowns to fine grid unknowns), meaning more aggressive coarsening requires the smoother to address a larger range of high frequencies [5].…”
Section: Polynomial Smoothingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generalized form offers even greater robustness, but relies on an expensive preprocessing step. One important issue is the choice of parallel smoother; this was studied in depth in [3], comparing parallel hybrid Gauss-Seidel orderings with polynomial (Chebyshev) smoothers and concluding that polynomial smoothers offer many advantages.…”
Section: Parallel Amgmentioning
confidence: 99%