2019
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ab35fb
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel quantum trajectories via forking for sampling without redundancy

Abstract: The computational cost of preparing a quantum state can be substantial depending on the structure of data to be encoded. Many quantum algorithms require repeated sampling to find the answer, mandating reconstruction of the same input state for every execution of an algorithm. Thus, the advantage of quantum computation can diminish due to redundant state initialization. We present a framework based on quantum forking that bypasses this fundamental issue and expedites a family of tasks that require sampling from… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The underlying idea is to adapt quantum forking introduced in refs. 12,13 to create an entangled state such that each subspace labeled by a basis state of the index qubits encodes a different training dataset. For brevity, we denote the controlled-swap operator by c-swap(a, b|c) to indicate that a and b are swapped if the control is c. With this notation, the classification can be expressed with the following equations.…”
Section: Kernel Construction From a Product Statementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The underlying idea is to adapt quantum forking introduced in refs. 12,13 to create an entangled state such that each subspace labeled by a basis state of the index qubits encodes a different training dataset. For brevity, we denote the controlled-swap operator by c-swap(a, b|c) to indicate that a and b are swapped if the control is c. With this notation, the classification can be expressed with the following equations.…”
Section: Kernel Construction From a Product Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also show that the post-selection can be avoided by measuring an expectation value of a two-qubit observable. The swap-test classifier can be implemented without relying on the specific initial state by using a method based on quantum forking 12,13 at the cost of increasing the number of qubits. In this case, the training data, corresponding labels, and the test data are provided on separate registers as a product state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 2 ) using a circuit with depth and O ( N ) qubits. The devised method is based on quantum forking 13 , 14 and uses a divide-and-conquer strategy 15 . The circuit depth is decreased at the cost of increasing the circuit width and creating entanglement between data register qubits and an ancillary system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these algorithms, a classification score is evaluated by measuring an expectation value of certain observables, and hence repeating the same experiment multiple times is inevitable for a reliable statistics. However, due to the measurement postulate of quantum mechanics and the no-cloning theorem, a same input state must be created for every execution of the algorithm [23]. Since computational cost for preparing an arbitrary quantum input state can be substantial depending on the structure of data to be encoded, reducing the number of repetition is essential [23], especially for NISQ computing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the measurement postulate of quantum mechanics and the no-cloning theorem, a same input state must be created for every execution of the algorithm [23]. Since computational cost for preparing an arbitrary quantum input state can be substantial depending on the structure of data to be encoded, reducing the number of repetition is essential [23], especially for NISQ computing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%