2011
DOI: 10.4018/jaec.2011040102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel Single and Multiple Objectives Genetic Algorithms

Abstract: This paper critically reviews the reported research on parallel single and multi-objective genetic algorithms. Many early efforts on single and multi-objective genetic algorithms were introduced to reduce the processing time needed to reach an acceptable solution. However, some parallel single and multi-objective genetic algorithms converged to better solutions as compared to comparable sequential single and multiple objective genetic algorithms. The authors review several representative models for parallelizi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in the actual optimization process, heuristic optimization algorithm is often used to solve multi-objective optimization problems. In this paper, genetic algorithm [22] is used to solve the multi-objective optimization model.…”
Section: Clustering Generation and Optimization Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the actual optimization process, heuristic optimization algorithm is often used to solve multi-objective optimization problems. In this paper, genetic algorithm [22] is used to solve the multi-objective optimization model.…”
Section: Clustering Generation and Optimization Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another disadvantage of GAs is that they are computationally slow. However, if necessary, the processing time can be significantly reduced by using parallel processing techniques204,205 and/or compute the fitness of individuals by using only a subset of training instances. Another possibility is to compute the fitness of some of the individuals and approximate others.…”
Section: Summary and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%