2017
DOI: 10.4155/bio-2017-0084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallelism Experiments to Evaluate Matrix Effects, Selectivity and Sensitivity in Ligand-Binding Assay Method Development: Pros and Cons

Abstract: Parallelism is an essential experiment characterizing relative accuracy for a ligandbinding assay (LBA). By assessing the effects of dilution on the quantitation of endogenous analyte(s) in matrix, selectivity, matrix effects, minimum required dilution, endogenous levels of healthy and diseased populations and the LLOQ are assessed in a single experiment. This review compares and discusses all available approaches that can be used to assess key assay parameters for pharmacokinetic and biomarker LBAs, as well a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For ligand binding assays (e.g., immunoassays), two key properties are specificity and selectivity 28 . The assay specificity refers to how well the assay (with its antibodies and other components) can distinguish between its intended analyte and other structurally similar components.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Reproducibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ligand binding assays (e.g., immunoassays), two key properties are specificity and selectivity 28 . The assay specificity refers to how well the assay (with its antibodies and other components) can distinguish between its intended analyte and other structurally similar components.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Reproducibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also evaluated the peptide-level similarity between Mus and Acomys for each gene represented on the array. Parallelism was examined using standard protocols (45,46). Briefly, samples from species and source were randomly pooled to provide a representative cytokine concentration and were run in triplicate at serial dilutions (1:2, 1:6, 1:18, 1:54, and 1:162).…”
Section: Cytokine Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We validated the IgA assay by checking for parallelism, accuracy, and intra‐ and inter‐assay coefficient of variation (CV). Testing for parallelism is important when commercial kits are used with fecal samples as these kits are designed for use with serum, and endogenous compounds in the fecal matrix may interfere with the binding of the IgA to the antibody (Tu & Bennett, 2017). Second, in a small set of samples, we assessed experimentally whether sample collection and storage conditions in the field affect IgA concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%